Posted on 04/15/2021 7:49:08 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
I just purchased “Blazing Saddles” because I think it could fall prey to the cultural Nazis, and I watched it again last night.
I find it laughable that so many people are offended by that movie and consider it racist and sexist.
It IS racist and sexist, and that is the whole POINT of the movie. And in watching the interviews of the surviving cast (when they made the videos) they all understood that what they were doing in that movie was pointing a finger at racists and sexists of all stripes and RIDICULING them!
It occurs to me that openly ridiculing REAL RACISM in that fashion is far, Far, FAR more effective than this totalitarian assault on speech and thought as they attempt to prohibit even the mention of those racist or sexist words.
I thought the legendary tank duel was between a Pershing and a King Tiger, not a Panther.
Whatever else we might think is wrong with the French, they do keep up war memorials very well.
What was most compelling:the engagement was captured on Signal Corps film from several angles. Those film clips captured the pain, fear and confusion of small unit actions. It was easy to visualize what that fight must have looked like and where the respective tanks were located, but I’m sure I looked pretty goofy standing on street corners looking for firing angles as the tourists wandered about.
Right you are. There was a duel between a super Pershing and a King Tiger at Dessau (3AD).
Good point!
We romanticize the past sometimes, we think that maybe in the past there once was a time where things were different and somehow...
If we only had something like FR in 1939/40, the flame wars would have been legendary. Pretty much every post would be somebody being accused of being a “Hitler lover” or a “Stalin lover”, or worst of all, “An FDR Lover”.
You’ll enjoy it. All of Adam Makos books are good.
I wonder, is it because on the West and East coast you have a greater number of first gen immigrants with values similar to where they came from, or loyalties to where they came from?
Or is it the greater degree of urbanization and influence this has?
Cities make people weird: crowding, public/community property, anonymity, the loss of an identity and feeling of being unique, social/natural disconnects (folks don’t even know where their food comes from), noise/light pollution (cities don’t sleep). It is in cities where people run metal through their nose and dye their hair blue in order to feel unique - or where “science” tells us XX and XY isn’t a girl or a boy. I tend to think it’s the urbanization because you see this everywhere, even in Europe, Asia, etc.
Bullets/ideas for your list.
My dad was USAF 1965 - 1988 and he actually remembers when they had to take their uniforms off before leaving the base and guys getting spat upon when returning from Vietnam. He actually has friends to whom that happened, and today you have college professors (in cities) teaching kids in college that this wasn’t really true or is all over hyped.
I served 1995 - 2005 and did two combat tours. It wasn’t as bad as for my dad in the 60s, but there it happened again. After 9-11 you had folks giving you their first class seats on an airplane when in uniform, but by the time the first elections came in 2004, Iraq was politicized and you had websites with body counts, non stop anti-Iraq war propaganda being spewed by a media highly biased because they always are on the Democrat side and their party chose to go anti-war in 2004 (opposition politics). You had movies like Fahrenheit 9-11 (total distortion of reality) come out coincidentally 5 months before the elections...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_9/11 Did you know when it’s a documentary different rules apply in so far as requirements to consent to be filmed but also for compensation? Michael Moore, the patriot social warrior exploited service members to make millions. $6 million budget, >$206 million revenue, because you don’t need to pay the folks actually fighting a war in your movie for real, not one penny if it’s a documentary.
But here is what is consistent. When you left the cities or you were in the so-called fly-over country, things never changed. They still supported the troops in Vietnam, or when Iraq kicked off, and BTW, contrary to the self victimized BS everyone wants to believe, that is where recruiting continued.
https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/wwi-casualties112018.pdf While the cities protest and talk about this or that, even claiming minorities do all the fighting, corn fed boys from the country do the bleeding, and statistically contrary to anything Hollywood or some social “scientist” talking about racism wants to make you believe, they are disproportionally white (76%: and that is counting Asians, blacks, Latino, and native Indian) and men (>85% in modern times, but if you count KIA from enemy action, it’s >95% since many of the casualties amount to accidents or environmental issues: example vehicle roll over or heat stroke).
I led various combat units and the MAJORITY of the guys are non-urban. Even if they are from California, or New York, they may tend to be from that state, but rural in that state and not from the urban areas that account for 71.2% of the US population.
There is a huge difference between rural and urban America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.