Posted on 04/12/2021 3:32:12 PM PDT by ransomnote
Dr. Tenpenny has written, “According to the Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker, as of Dec. 26, 2020, 83 vaccines are in Phase 1, 2 or 3 human and animal clinical trials, with 18 approaching the final stages of testing.
Never before have so many companies tested so many different vaccines at the same time, against a virus that has not been isolated. Of those in the trials, five vaccines are now early use, with three vaccines approved for clinical use Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca.”
“Are you willing to be injected with something unknown and never tested before in humans?” she asks.
After all, humans are now the guinea pigs for these injections.
Tenpenny warns that those who have taken the vaccine will begin to become sick and many will die within 3-6 months.
I don’t think masks work. After you have covid and recover you are naturally vaccinated. I view the masks as at best virtue signaling. There is not the first proof masks block transmission. So yeah. I think mandates are unconstitutional an stupid.
I am of the opinion of you have had covid there is no need for vaccination.
“It’s not a vaccine.”
It’s a cookbook!
I have treated thousands. I have had sick people teetering who got monoclonal infusions and were better in 12 hours. I have given ivermectin and seen people go on to die.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Have you given monoclonal infusions and had the patient go on to die? Have you given ivermectin and seen a quick improvement?
Not doubting your experience, just asking for the sake of thoroughness.
How very sad.
Whatever shall I do?
That I will. Thanks, grampy.
See if you can find the personal attack hidden within this paragraph.
You see......if I was a Q’er and was offended, the way your buddy gay_whispers......oops, I mean grey_whiskers......I would report this to the Mods as a personal attack and demand you were censored and even banned forever.
#Mansplaining
Yes, I knew that. What they are NOT protected from, is potentially catastrophic damage to the public trust in their brand if there was some massive bad effect including tens of thousands or even "millions" (as the anti-vaxxers have claimed) of people dying after taking the vaccine.
Not gonna happen. A 175+ year old, Fortune 500 (#64) company is not going to risk that type of damage to the public trust as it would essentially put them out of business - NOT because they can be sued directly by people who suffered harm because of the vaccine, but because the public trust would be totally and completely shot - and they'd likely not be able to even sell water to people in the Sahara after that.
You're falling short of even YOUR abysmally low standards -- and that's a very low bar in the first place.
I dub thee "Soi-Lord"
Now do Peter Stzrok, Hillary Clinton, and Hunter Biden.
No idea. I'm not a biologist, virologist, DNA researcher, etc. Not my fields, I have almost no education in these areas. Heck, I barely passed chemistry in college getting my undergraduate degree.
What I do have is nearly 60 years experience walking this planet, roughly 50 of them doing geeky engineer type stuff.
Three degrees in science and engineering fields.
Three plus decades as an engineer.
An appreciation for human history, in particular as it relates to scientific and engineering adventures.
A cynical attitude developed through long experience with a cynical attitude having been on-target.
An appreciation and deeply held belief in Murphy's law.
But don't worry, I'm not falling into the "appeal to the expert" fallacy. Those points are just there to tell you where I'm coming from.
I also know that mRNA technology has never been used in widespread human trials before.
I know that even the more traditional J&J vaccine was rushed into use faster and more widespread than virtually any other vaccine in history.
I know that one vaccine's initial trial group was 43,000 or so people. An impressive number until you realize that represents just 0.013% of the US population. So we have data on an extremely small percentage (what might be called a rounding error in many engineering endeavors) of the population that we have just barely one year of data on. For most other people, none of these vaccines have ever been tried on someone, anyone with their makeup of DNA, medical history, medications, immune system response, general health, diet, exercise, alcohol use, previous exposure to covid-19 strains or other viruses, etc. Heck, we don't even know (yet) what factors may be important or not. But we're damn-sure going to find out. Some of us have, and are, going to find out the hard way.
I know that even the FDA that approved these vaccines did so only on an emergency basis and as an experimental treatment.
I know we've never before put over a hundred million people into a drug trial before.
So my expectation that we will ultimately be putting tens of thousands of people into early graves, or "merely" into hospitals to receive treatment, or giving them some form of side-effect from the merely annoying to those requiring admission into long term care facilities - is based on our human history of screwing up the first time out of the gate. Statistically, even if our rushed into use, based on new technology vaccines are 99.5% trouble free - which I'm saying in my experience is likely to be wildly optimistic - we're still going to give something like 750,000 people problems of some sort.
I realize I am not in the medical field. Yes, in my experience we screw things up a little or a lot the first time out. I can hear people out there thinking "Yeah, it's one thing to mess up in xyz field, but we have safeguards in fields like aviation and medicine..." Yeah, exactly, and we're currently violating many of those long-developed and blood-soaked safeguards. That is exactly my point.
I shall help you.
I know you like to defend Ransomnote’s threads.
You may even have the hots for her.....but that doesn’t matter.
In doing so, rather than use debate skills with facts as you see them, you flood her thread with obnoxious memes.
Sure, some are humorous, but then you really get going and before you know it scrolling along are memes and off topic comments as we see smiley face after smiley face scroll by.
Soon there is very little left of Ransomnote’s thread.
For that those that might totally disagree with her post are thankful for you and those that agree, well, their comments are sandwiched in between your distracting memes.
The thread is then useless and loses all of its meaning.
I’m sure others see this too but won’t tell you.
Ok. So you made a very good point.
It was quick, and extremely effective.
This is what I call a very good debate.
It was “greed” not green.
I don’t rule out money won’t be a factor in the future, but right now at least it’s not.
Trump paid them ahead of time. But the manufacturers might want to dine at the Buffet again later.
Money is green; typo likely autocorrect related.
Your assertion does not cover "every 6 months booster shot" BS pushed by Faux-Xi.
Again a great point however Fauci has been wrong and/or changed his mind before.
Fauci is the only one talking about booster.......I guess we’ll see but I’ll hold out until Pfizer says it.
Let’s hope not. A year from now I want Covid-19 to be a bad dream of yester-year........
That's why you brought up Q on a covid thread, which was your original troll and personal attack. You are a noob troll with sensitivity issues. Rub some dirt on it and move on.
Your mouth moves, but all I hear is wind.
#StayOnTopic
#NotAboutMeOrQ
#NotAboutYourFeelings
#LivesHangInTheBalance
Yeah, I’ve seen that and how it is misrepresented by the kooks.
He is talking about the behavioral changes in families when their kids don’t die in infancy. People who live in 3rd world shitholes where vaccine preventable diseases are rampant have lots of children because so many die in infancy.
When your babies live and thrive, you have fewer of them and concentrate your resources on them. This is borne out by the statistics of developed/developing nations around the world. When infant mortality goes down, so do reproductive rates.
So preventing the major drivers of infant mortality through vaccines is a no brainer. Now you’d think liberals would be all about saving children just for humanitarian reasons, but you’d be wrong.
Those assholes believe in overpopulation, so they think kids dying is helpful. Gates uses the the math to show these jerks that they are wrong about that. Saving the babies reduces the reproduction rates and contributes to lower population growth.
It’s a fundraising technique, because most of the billionaire set would rather save baby seals than human ones. But telling them that saving babies through vaccines will reduce population growth gets them to open their wallets.
Fair questions all.
I have seen the monoclonal stop disease in its tracks. I have not seen anyone progress to death but there is a finite window of 10 days since symptoms.
I have seen ivermectin turn some around but much less than 50%. In terms of better tx that are not monoclonal antibodies tolcilizumab seems somewhat better than ivermectin. But still 50-60% range in late phase disease
Yes. I’m devastated.
Like the song says.....”The first cut is the deepest....”
Recovery will be long and hard.
Psssst......I mention Q as needed when it’s called for. I have do so before I was told to say out of your safe space.
Now show some respect to your friend Ransomnote and stop Hi-Jacking her threads with your nonsense.........
#ObsessedButtHurtTrollBoi
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.