Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: How The Depopulation COVID Vaccines Will Start Working In 3-6 Months

ransomnote: I recommend the video at link (scroll down the page) and I only skimmed the article below

PUBLISHED ON: FEBRUARY 11, 2021

Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor, board certified in three medical specialties. Widely regarded as the most knowledgeable and outspoken physician on the adverse impact that vaccines can have on health, Dr. Tenpenny has been a guest on hundreds of radio and national television programs (including the Dr. Oz Show and the Today Show Australia).

She has lectured at Cleveland State University and Case Western Reserve Medical School, and has been a speaker at conventions, both nationally and internationally, as a recognized expert on a wide range topics within the field of Integrative Medicine including breast health, breast thermography, women’s hormones, medical uses of iodine and the adverse effects vaccines have on health.

She is also a voice crying in the wilderness concerning vaccines and current events. Now, she is warning the public that the COVID vaccines’ depopulation effects will start in 3 to 6 months.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: How The Depopulation COVID Vaccines Will Start Working In 3-6 Months » Sons of Liberty Media

Dr. Tenpenny has written, “According to the Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker, as of Dec. 26, 2020, 83 vaccines are in Phase 1, 2 or 3 human and animal clinical trials, with 18 approaching the final stages of testing.

Never before have so many companies tested so many different vaccines at the same time, against a virus that has not been isolated. Of those in the trials, five vaccines are now early use, with three vaccines approved for clinical use Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca.”

“Are you willing to be injected with something unknown and never tested before in humans?” she asks.

Tenpenny warns that those who have taken the vaccine will begin to become sick and many will die within 3-6 months.

“I advocate once fully vaccinated lose the mask life life freely. Of course I never believed in masking snd don’t you dare construe this as endorsing a so called vaccine passport.“

Just for clarity, do you support “lose the mask” for those who are not vaccinated? Same question for those who got covid but recovered?

And last question, I am hearing that people who have had covid should still be vaccinated. What do you think of that?

HOWEVER, do you deny it is accurate to say that if HCQ and Ivermectin were approved therapeutics for CoVID, then the FDA’s EUA for their fake “vaccine” would go up in smoke, as ransomnote is contending?

If someone is denying me a therapeutic that’s cheaper than a good bottle of wine “because reasons”, then I tend to get suspicious.

Couple that with the lying @ssclown hobbit Fauchnocchio, then I get REAL suspicious.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes. The terms of an EUA require that no other treatment be available, and the situation is an emergency.
Withholding these medications from patients created both an emergency (needless death) and the fake impression that no other drugs were available.

“The feqrmongers are the ones who got you to clamor for a vax then line up happily like sheep for the jab.”

The scamdemic narrative has always required fear.

How else would one explain the idiots driving their cars alone while wearing a mask, walking outside alone while wearing a mask, playing competitive soccer outside wearing a mask, or husband/wife (who live together) social distancing for their daily evening walk?

Accusing us anti-cv19vaxxers of fear is a kind of sociopathic manipulation/projection on the part of rabid pro-vaxxers. Many of us have written about our reasons to refuse cv19vx. No need to repeat ourselves again, but needless to say, it ain’t about fear. What many of us do fear is not having the right to refuse med treatment including vax.

The mRA injections were released (as another pro-jab poster said proudly) using an Emergency Use Authorization.

It doesn't appear they went through the full-size, full-length Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials, right? Or if you have information about the size, duration, and results of those trials, from NIH or CDC or FDA or whichever set of overfed DC bureaucrats runs those things, let me know.

However, a 1.8% death rate from a highly infectious virus is super high from the public health perspective, regardless of whether you personally think a 1 in 50 chance of dying is acceptable.

You should know better than to spread fear porn; the chance of death is not uniform among all infected; instead being drastically skewed towards those over 70 with co-morbidities or a history of smoking.

Why then the rush to lock down entire states, forbid any sort of mingling and give *everyone* an mRA jab under Emergency Use Authorization?

Something smells, bad.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.