You’re lying through your teeth as usual.
It’s not “I don’t like people posting who disagree with me.”
It’s that I don’t like trolls spreading open lies over and over and over again.
While pretending to look down on their superiors, and deliberately mischaracterizing those who oppose the jab as uninformed drunken redneck incestuous hillbillies, or similar.
And using “Who, ME?” when called out on their insults.
If, instead of mindlessly crowing, about “I F’ING LOVE *SCIENCE*!” you actually cite the studies, and can discuss the relevant portions of the studies, with an eye to looking out for systemic error, sloppy statistics, deviation for the mRNA jab from accepted practice on prior vaccinations, addressing the wildly different levels of rigor on assigning c00f deaths vs. assigning negative sequelae to the jab, and the socio political ramifications of the entire push, then do so.
Otherwise, you will be deservedly flamed.
Re: 226
If only it were that easy. I have seen people argue logically, passionately on both sides of the vaccine issue.
And both sides make it personal. Including you.
You’ve essentially admitted that if you disagree with someone based on the facts, that it could be considered a lie on their part. Your choice.
Just understand that people that don’t agree with your viewpoint will be on FR.
And that’s the way it is.