If Mills generates the breakthrough, then fantastic. I find his meanderings difficult to follow.
2 of my better-educated friends looked into his work.
One of them was Dr. pHIL Payne, who wrote a report titled “OH Radical” appearing on BLP’s list of publications.
https://brilliantlightpower.com/publications/
Another is a chief Architect at a silicon design engineering firm here in silicon valley. He was in Harvard’s Physics PhD program until he stopped work to go into industry when his wife got pregnant. He said that the Hydrino / GUTCP theory lined up better with current physics unknowns than any previous theory he had encountered. When I kept pressing him to look into this deeper, he said something like, “that’s YOUR hobby, not mine”. He knows a career killer when he sees one.
re: “He knows a career killer when he sees one.”
Peter Hagelstein of MIT lead off with a comment on that very thing a few years back during one of his IAP sessions ...
I’m curious if you’ve ever seen this talk by Prof. Huub Bakker, a senior lecturer in engineering at Massey University. In the linked video presentation below he presents a lecture on Randell Mills’ Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUTCP). This followed up by a (IMHO) weak rebuttable by Prof. Tony Signal, representing the Physics Dept., responding with a critical view.
Prof. Bakker’s presentation is a survey of Mills’ 1800-page thesis and necessarily omits any deep analysis or mathematical proofs. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating introduction to the topic and he forcefully makes the point that Mills is either a fraud or the most gifted thinker of our time. According to Bakker, “there is no middle ground.”
The lecture begins at timestamp 04:30.
http://webcast.massey.ac.nz/Mediasite/Play/8ef7e03e26fc458b8eb7f351738f26811d