Posted on 04/05/2021 11:12:52 AM PDT by Kevmo
Then respond to my request for you to leave , “follow my lead” as you claimed to have done, do the right thing as a FReeper, follow Jimrob’s lead , open your own threads.
Your whole approach is dripping with disingenuous insincerity.
Mills frustrates me. He’s been at it for about 30 years, and he always switches gears at the last minute.
I have no doubt he’s brilliant. He’s just overdue, oversold, and overbearing.
Please leave WE alone. He’s been in the trenches with me on these LENR threads. I think you guys may have a miscommunication.
Swartz hooked up a small Stirling Cycle motor to his NANOR device, ran it continually for MONTHS. A conventional source would have been depleted in a matter of hours.
WE should be WW (wonder warthog) I really really hate autocorrect. Really.
LOL..PhD Chemist, nuclear chemistry minor, two R&D 100 awards, one international award in chem (Japanese society). Nuclear experience, instrument design, biowarfare research. Retired after fifty years of high level research.....but “I” am not bright enough.
I looked into “BL” when it was “Black Light” and not “Brilliant Light” MANY, MANY years ago. Mills has been selling his stuff longer and with as little success as Rossi.
Show me the SCIENCE, not bullshit.
Looks like cold fusion entropy is at an end.
“perfect and timely example of seagulling”
I know, right?
Too cheap to meter was the mantra of the 1960’s.
It was also thought then that we’d be on mars by the 1990’s easy.
Things fell apart in the 70’s.
What’s the difference between then and now.
Computers, software. and networks.This means the speed at which events/inventions/decisions happen is much accelerated and what’s more yearly the acceleration accelerates.
205 W in, 205 W out.
That is impossible to do if you’re applying 205 W to a load. A calorimetry setup is a load.
205 W into a load with 205 W out of a load at the very least represents the presence of a superconducting load, which is impossible in current chemical knowledge.
Looks like I’ll need to respond to seagulls differently , then.
Then stop doing it, jerk.
You’re just a seagull
Looks like the seagulls are finally opening their own naysayer threads. Good for them.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3948076/posts
I know, I saw it.
Planck’s law is in full effect, science is advancing one funeral at a time.
https://www.nber.org/digest/mar16/does-science-advance-one-funeral-time
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.