“On what case? A little more information would be helpful”
Exactly. Some random person posts about Kavanaugh voting with No Context Whatsoever and the result is a bunch of other random people joins in a bash fest when not a single example has been cited in making the original accusation.
The vast majority of the moron class can’t even understand an opinion beyond the way that some equally moronic reporter frames a case in a headline.
The lack of specificity here is very typical.
Over the past two years, the (Kavanaugh-Roberts) bromance has budded. In OT 2018, Roberts and Kavanaugh were in full agreement 78% of the time, and agreed in full or part 89% of the time. In OT 2019, Roberts and Kavanaugh fully agreed 88% of the time, and agreed in full or part 92% of the time. For OT 2019, the runner-up doublet was Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan, who agreed 82% of the time. By contrast, Justices Thomas and Gorsuch agreed only 52% of the time. And Roberts and Thomas agreed only 41% of the time. So far this term, the trend continues. On Thursday, Roberts and Kavanaugh were wingmen with the Kagan-three in two sharply divided cases: Torres and Ford.