What lie is that again?
Still waiting....
Posted on 03/29/2021 11:12:08 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
When former President Donald Trump was asked to list those he considers the future leaders of the Republican Party, he quickly rattled off a list of names, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Sens. Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz. Conspicuously absent from the list: Mike Pence.
The former vice president is steadily reentering public life as he eyes a potential run for the White House in 2024. He’s joining conservative organizations, writing op-eds, delivering speeches and launching an advocacy group that will focus on promoting the Trump administration’s accomplishments.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
Good copy, unwilling to admit fraudulence of the election.
Constitution doesn’t say to commit a crime and certify a fraud you know.
Not getting my vote.
I and my immediate family will sit out 2024 if this traitor runs for office, bet.
NO!! He’s a ROLL OVER!! I want someone who will FIGHT and NOT BACK DOWN!!
“Did Pence certify a fraudulent election, yes or no.
Is it lawful to certify a fraudulent election, yes or no.”
Did the Senate certify a fraudulent election? is the apt question.
Maybe they did., but the Constitution says they can if they want.
TOAST
“but the Constitution says they can if they want.”
Bzzzzt, wrong!
Says it is a crime.
But you know that.
Nowhere does it say “you must commit a crime”.
The Constitution says the Senate can accept a determination by the state legislatures by goat entrails of the winner of the Presidency.
This may seem illogical to the ignorant, but it’s basic to our Founding.
So fraud is okay according to the constitution?
You’re sure of that?
bookmark
I’m sure the Senate has the final say on the winner of the Presidency.
Apparently you don’t think our Founders were wise to make that so.
I do.
Not condemnoing you for opposing our Founders, I just don’t thinnk you’ve thought this through.
What you are saying is that fraud is legal and constitutional.
That really IS what you are saying.
yeah...and Dan Quayle is going to be his running mate...
Don’t.
Give.
Ideas.
What you are saying is that the support of the states legislatures is not sufficient to appoint a President.
A silly claim to argue IMO.
We’ve a federal system. Much as the media may hate it.
Not at all.
Fraud is wrong and should always be opposed.
Nowhere does it say you must certify fraud.
Curious.
Is there someone beside the Senate you would put the determination of the legitamacy of the Presidential vote in?
mmmm...several courts at state, federal and SCOTUS level have decided anyone daring to question a DERP certified election outcome hasn’t “standing”.
And thats a ‘true fact”
Absent a quasi-legal solution to grotesque electoral fraud...it otherwise stands for all time.
The only real question is whether “We the People” stand for fraud going forward.
Most seem to want to stay seated at their keyboards, get another beer, and b&*tch about the last episode of fraud, rather than pound the pavement in their local precincts to be certain local election law is followed and enforced
HA HA HA HA HA!!!! Keep dreaming American Pravda.
Yes, we know you donkeys want your beloved RINOs to go on being in charge and being the Washington Generals of political parties - a pretend opposition. But those days are over.
Pence has utterly no shot whatsoever.
LOL!
Our Founders had a straightforward solution- the Senate will decide.
What lie is that again?
Still waiting....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.