You think that would be happy about this and cheering her as a hero.
No they’re just using it to smear her with conservatives.
She didn’t sign onto the bill because it was technically written very poorly and would have been overturned by the courts.
The left would have said “aha the opposite must be constitutional”. That’s how they got gay marriage.
I call it “repeal to a third position”, and that’s how liberals get laws by judicial fiat that would not have been supported by voters.
She didn’t sign onto the bill because it was technically written very poorly and would have been overturned by the courts.
The left would have said “aha the opposite must be constitutional”. That’s how they got gay marriage.
1)Did the left want her to sign the bill? No.
2)When was the last time a Dem didn’t sign a bill because it was “poorly written?” Never.