[ransomnote]

Excerpted from prior post on FR:

Here’s some quotes from the HHS Guide to Interpreting Data in VAERS:

“When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established.”

“VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.”

“VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors.”

“A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described.”

“No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report.”

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ransomnote: There's also no proof that the event was NOT caused by the vaccine, because no experimental gene therapy rushed to market in 6 months without sufficient testing or FDA approval could possibly have enough evidence to prove anything.

That's why they are rushing to get as many 'shots' in arms as possible before someone halts this awful travesty.

Causal data takes years to accumulate (est. 10 years  of blood, urine, and other bio assessments, extensive human trials to determine long term impacts, etc.). So essentially you are arguing the fact that the mRNA Covid 'vaccines' are not FDA approved, little understood, and insufficiently tested renders the only information available to the public regarding deaths from the Covid-19 'vaccines' of no value. By this reasoning, the medical establishment can role out whatever 'vaccine' it wants and won't consider this data valid and no corrections will be made if a vaccine proves harmful until years down the road when it's studied. No matter how many people die daily, according to your 'reasoning', the public and the medical community should not use this data.

Using VAERS event data, 1985 deaths have been reported since adminstration began December 14, 2020. A total of 103 days have elapsed during the administration of the vaccine. Based only on observations recorded in VAERS, an average of 19 deaths per day have been reporte for Covid in VAERS during the entire administration of the Covid 'vaccine' in the U.S.

But since the rule-of-thumb for VAERS data is that only 10% of total events are reported, there has likely been 19,850 actual deaths during this time period which is an average 190 people per day.

But according to  your 'logic', it doesn't matter if 500,000 deaths were reported to VAERS for the COVID vaccine for this time period, which would be a daily average of 4,854.

There would be no proof that the COVID vaccine is NOT responsible for this fantastically exaggerated average number of deaths per day, just as there would be no proof that it is responsible for them. This is why it disgusts me to see you blanket every conversation and thread with your 'talking points'. You intentionally assert a burden of proof based on data you know will be unavailable for 10 years or more.  

When people grasp at the only data they can find (e.g., VAERS) your kind sneers that the data means NOTHING. If we accept your logic, the public would not have a single shred of information no matter how many people collapse and die   - even if they did so within 40 seconds of having the injection, because the experimental 'vaccines' have never been sufficiently studied so the cause/effect relationship has not been demonstrated in the lab, YET.

Now that I know how deeply the CDC has betrayed the public with its malevolent manipulation (e.g., withholding effective treatments while people die, lying about masks, immunity, the 'vaccines', knowing use of the  invalid PCR) I believe that the CDC would not hesitate to underreport death totals as there would be no other record of deaths available to the public to compare with. It's the kind of lie with which the CDC has become accustomed.

71 posted on 3/27/2021, 10:22:28 PM by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

Excerpted from prior post on FR:

Here’s some quotes from the HHS Guide to Interpreting Data in VAERS:

“When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established.”

“VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.”

“VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors.”

“A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described.”

“No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report.”

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ransomnote: There's also no proof that the event was NOT caused by the vaccine, because no experimental gene therapy rushed to market in 6 months without sufficient testing or FDA approval could possibly have enough evidence to prove anything.

That's why they are rushing to get as many 'shots' in arms as possible before someone halts this awful travesty.

Causal data takes years to accumulate (est. 10 years  of blood, urine, and other bio assessments, extensive human trials to determine long term impacts, etc.). So essentially you are arguing the fact that the mRNA Covid 'vaccines' are not FDA approved, little understood, and insufficiently tested renders the only information available to the public regarding deaths from the Covid-19 'vaccines' of no value. By this reasoning, the medical establishment can role out whatever 'vaccine' it wants and won't consider this data valid and no corrections will be made if a vaccine proves harmful until years down the road when it's studied. No matter how many people die daily, according to your 'reasoning', the public and the medical community should not use this data.

Using VAERS event data, 1985 deaths have been reported since adminstration began December 14, 2020. A total of 103 days have elapsed during the administration of the vaccine. Based only on observations recorded in VAERS, an average of 19 deaths per day have been reporte for Covid in VAERS during the entire administration of the Covid 'vaccine' in the U.S.

But since the rule-of-thumb for VAERS data is that only 10% of total events are reported, there has likely been 19,850 actual deaths during this time period which is an average 190 people per day.

But according to  your 'logic', it doesn't matter if 500,000 deaths were reported to VAERS for the COVID vaccine for this time period, which would be a daily average of 4,854.

There would be no proof that the COVID vaccine is NOT responsible for this fantastically exaggerated average number of deaths per day, just as there would be no proof that it is responsible for them. This is why it disgusts me to see you blanket every conversation and thread with your 'talking points'. You intentionally assert a burden of proof based on data you know will be unavailable for 10 years or more.  

When people grasp at the only data they can find (e.g., VAERS) your kind sneers that the data means NOTHING. If we accept your logic, the public would not have a single shred of information no matter how many people collapse and die   - even if they did so within 40 seconds of having the injection, because the experimental 'vaccines' have never been sufficiently studied so the cause/effect relationship has not been demonstrated in the lab, YET.

Now that I know how deeply the CDC has betrayed the public with its malevolent manipulation (e.g., withholding effective treatments while people die, lying about masks, immunity, the 'vaccines', knowing use of the  invalid PCR) I believe that the CDC would not hesitate to underreport death totals as there would be no other record of deaths available to the public to compare with. It's the kind of lie with which the CDC has become accustomed.

[ColoCdn]

Well said.

[miserare]

Thank you, ransomnote.