Posted on 03/27/2021 3:43:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
The numbers reflect the latest data available as of Feb. 12 from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website. Of the 929 reported deaths, about one-third occurred within 48 hours.
According to new data released today, as of Feb. 12, 15,923 adverse reactions to COVID vaccines, including 929 deaths, have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since Dec. 14, 2020.
VAERS is the primary mechanism in the U.S. for reporting adverse vaccine reactions. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a determination can be made as to whether the reported adverse event was directly or indirectly caused by the vaccine.
The latest VAERS data show that 799 of the deaths were reported in the U.S., and that about one-third of those deaths occurred within 48 hours of the individual receiving the vaccination.
As is consistent with previous VAERS data reports, 192 of the reported deaths — or 21% — were cardiac-related. As The Defender reported last month, the spike protein that the body is instructed to make by mRNA vaccines like those developed by Pfizer and Moderna have the potential to cause microvascular injury (inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi) to the heart, brain, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.
Of the 929 deaths reported since Dec. 14, 2020, the average age of the deceased was 77.8 and the youngest was 23. Fifty-two percent of the reported deaths were among men, 45% were women and 3% are unknown. Fifty-eight percent of the deaths were reported in people who received the Pfizer vaccine, and 41% were related to the Moderna vaccine.
States with the highest reported number of deaths were: California (71); Florida (50); Ohio (38); New York (31); Kentucky (41); Michigan (31); and Texas (31).
CBS Detroit reported this week that a 68-year old news anchor died one day after being vaccinated for COVID of a suspected stroke.
Reports of deaths among elderly people after being vaccinated for COVID continue to surface, including the article published this week by The Defender about 46 nursing home residents in Spain who died within one month of receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
According to the latest data, 3,126 “serious” adverse reactions have been reported. Adverse reaction reports from the latest CDC data also include:
So far, only Pfizer and Moderna vaccines — approved for emergency use, but not fully licensed — are being used in the U.S.
AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine, which does not use mRNA technology, was approved for emergency use this week by the World Health Organization, paving the way for some countries to start using it. However, as The Defender reported this week, some nations have said they won’t use it, citing safety and efficacy concerns.
FiercePharma reported today that the FDA may reject the AstraZeneca vaccine over concerns relating to efficacy, especially against new COVID variants, and manufacturing issues.
News reports indicate that a growing number of people, including nearly 30% of healthcare workers, now say they don’t want the COVID vaccine, citing safety concerns.
The Washington Post reported this week that nearly a third of military personnel are opting out of the vaccines, and ESPN reported that top NBA players are reluctant to promote the vaccine.
Meanwhile, the FDA has not yet implemented systems to monitor the safety of the experimental COVID vaccines. FDA officials told The New York Times they don’t expect the systems to be up and running before the Biden administration reaches its goal of vaccinating 100 million Americans — nearly one third of the U.S. population.
As of Feb. 19, about 56.3 million people in the U.S. had received one or both doses of a COVID vaccine.
While the VAERS database numbers may seem sobering, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study, the actual number of adverse events is likely significantly higher. VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on the willingness of individuals to submit reports voluntarily.
According to the VAERS website, healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS:
The CDC says healthcare providers are strongly encouraged to report:
However, “within the specified time” means that reactions occurring outside that timeframe may not be reported, in addition to reactions suffered hours or days later by people who don’t report those reactions to their healthcare provider.
Vaccine manufacturers are required to report to VAERS “all adverse events that come to their attention.”
Historically, however, fewer than fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to VAERS, a system that Children’s Health Defense has previously referred to as an “abject failure,” including in a December 2020 letter to Dr. David Kessler, former FDA director and now co-chair of the COVID-19 Advisory Board and President Biden’s version of Operation Warp Speed.
A critic familiar with VAERS’ shortcomings bluntly condemned VAERS in The BMJ as “nothing more than window dressing, and a part of U.S. authorities’ systematic effort to reassure/deceive us about vaccine safety.”
CHD is calling for complete transparency. The children’s health organization is asking Kessler and the federal government to release all of the data from the clinical trials and suspend COVID-19 vaccine use in any group not adequately represented in the clinical trials, including the elderly, frail and anyone with comorbidities.
CHD is also asking for full transparency in post-marketing data that reports all health outcomes, including new diagnoses of autoimmune disorders, adverse events and deaths from COVID vaccines.
Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.
Had a great friend that was in a wheelchair in a couple years from that vaccine. I seem to remember the military in denial.
I’ve noticed quite a few people are trying to shame people by calling them anti-Trump if they’re not pro-vaxx.
^
125 thanks
There are many medicines and drugs that save lives. These vax are not them. They are themselves.
And they are developed under sketchy circumstances by sketchy people who have lied about many things and continue to lie.
All of a sudden they stopped lying and became good?
Bill Gates/China/CDC/WHO/Democrats/Fauci/Etc.
Weak rhetorical trick, doomed to fail
That dugway chap. My bad.
He'll see it.
bagster wrote: “I’m gonna need some names, sport.”
Why the aversion to peer reviewed studies to make your point?
Studies where the authors defend their allegations before the healthcare community. One can only conclude their claims are indefensible.
Now, name the reputable scientific medical journals where they have published. Written studies, peer reviewed.
Now, is that nice?
But, yeah...let’s get worked up 1,000 (dead) out of tens of millions.
Am I supposed to weep over every obit in the paper?
I do not ask you to weep. I merely ask you to be less callous and to respect the dead, rather than use them as a cheap parlor trick to make a rhetorical point on the internet and win an argument. Many of those number died as a result of the vaccine that you're pushing.
I believe the relatives of the dead you mock would have something to say to you about that.
Is respect for the dead too much to ask?
Why are you being so pedantic? (It means nit-picky, because I am sure you don’t know the definition, nor do you own a dictionary.)
Thank you for teaching me a new word, thesaurus man. I do own a dictionary and I also know how to use dictionary.com on my computer. Now all I need to do is learn to read and push the letter buttons on the keyboard in the right order.
Don’t you have a quatrain to interpret?
Qua...what? I am a student of life. I interpret all around me. There is much to be learned.
Am I still supposed to Trust Sessions?
You have my permission to trust whomever you like. Be it Biden, the CDC, WHO, Fauci, or the fake news media. Anybody at all. Though I recommend against those I listed. But to each his own.
Good morning.
Rebuttal noted.
'They'?
Now Duggy, you're just being difficult.
WHO are you asking me to do your research ON, exactly?
You MUST name them, or I can't even tell you to go do your own research, much less do it for you.
Are you having a hard time filling in the holes in your empty rhetoric?
#BuildBackBetter
Helpful hint:
You seem capable of making the paragraph using HTML. Let's go for the gusto.
It makes for a much prettier and understandable post if, rather than 'bagster wrote', you italicize the quote.
Remember those < > you put the 'P' in to make a paragraph? Put them at the start of the quote, but this time put an 'I' inside. then at the end put this /i inside another set of them. Voila, italics.
signed,
Your friend,
bagster wrote: “Now Duggy, you’re just being difficult. WHO are you asking me to do your research ON, exactly?”
The only thing difficult is your inability to provide credible, peer reviewed, studies published in a reputable scientific medical journal that support you claims. Instead, you would rather reference videos that fit none of those criteria.
So, the italic lesson didn't take, huh? Okey dokey then. Adult learners are the hardest.
Now I'm starting to think you're of substandard intelligence, Dougy the Puggy, with all due respect.
Two questions:
What claims have I made?
What videos have I referenced, and where?
Now answer those two questions or I'm left to assume that you're a bot, with your canned repetitive responses. Or, maybe you think you're talking to somebody else?
Lemme clue you in, smart boy, so we can end this charade, as fun as its been for me. I have NEVER referenced a YouTube video about the 'rona. Not once. Ever. In the history of ever. Nor have I ever watched one on the 'rona or the vax. Ain't nobody got time for dat. If you can show me where I have, I'll give you a shiny nickel.
If I was less lazy, I would watch them till the cows come home and will anytime I feel like it. They can be a great resource, if you watch the right people.
So you can see how funny I find you right now, runnin' 'round screamin' about YouTube videos like a fat kid lookin' for cake and talkin' 'bout 'credibiliy' like as if you had some.
I will give you credit for persistence, though. You do know how to ride a dead horse.
So, anyway. How 'bout that fake Chinese potion vax all the vaxtards are taking? Where do you stand on that issue? I understand its quite controversial. At least that's what the YouTube man tells me. He's my go to guy for any and all information about everything ever.
You're adorable.
bagster wrote: “You’re adorable.”
And you still can’t provide credible, peer reviewed, studies published in medical journals.
bagster wrote: “What claims have I made? What videos have I referenced, and where?”
Here’s one:
bagster wrote: “Wrongo. Jordan Peterson makes YouTube videos, as do many reputable people. It is the new media and you might even say, the new classroom in the digital age. Why aren’t they using peer reviewed scientific journals? For the same reason scientists opposed to the bogus climate change hoax are shut out of the scientific community, fired from their positions, and frozen out of the conversation (like some attempt to do to ‘Qtards’ right here on FR).” (Post 199)
I have NEVER referenced a YouTube video about the 'rona. Not once. Ever. In the history of ever. Nor have I ever watched one on the 'rona or the vax.
key: 'rona = coronavirus, vax = vaccine.
Oooops.
Maybe you don't know who Jordan Peterson is, his resume is up to snuff, even to your lofty standards I would assume. But funny thing is, he's a Professor of Psychiatry and has nothing to do at all with the 'rona or vaccines. As far as it goes, I recommend him to you. Not sure you'd be able to keep up with him, he's VERY smart (even smarter than me), but give it a shot.
So, your 'gotcha' moment has come and gone. Sorry all your hard work searching for it just ended up with you looking like a dufus. Try more.
And bro, your cro-magnon post formatting is increasingly hard to interpret. It goes to your credibility.
#TimesRunningOut
I fully understand that, I am a survivor of rhabdomyosarcoma and have neurofibromatosis. I am currently weighing the option of taking a recently approved medication for some benign tumors I have. My point is that for a disease that has less than a 0.2% fatality rate in the young and healthy one needs to weigh the risks and benefits of the unknown.
I will not be shamed because I believe that this virus is 99.8% survivable without under lying conditions!! The vaccine has NOT been proven for LONG TERM side effects that could happen not every person is the same and I WILL NOT be a test subject NO THANKS!! I am making sure my immune system is in tip top shape, hands washed all the time, sanitize my shopping cart handles and that is good enough!! My mom is 91 and in my home she will NOT be receiving the vaccine either NO WAY!!!
You have made the fatal error of rendering your opinion in the one place on the world wide web with the highest concentration of top scientists to be found.
Almost everyone who posts here has at least a Masters or better in the health sciences, and they truly do know best. We are lucky to have them.
They have gathered here from across the globe, from some of the most prestigious Universities and medical research facilities on the planet to guide us and teach us how to bend the knee to our betters and comply.
You will do well to heed their wise words. If they say take the jab, then do yourself a favor and take the jab.
What could go wrong when the denizens of FReeRepublic have given approval, hey?
I am always respectful to the dead.
I would even be gracious in public about your passing.
A Quatrain is the method Nostradamus used for his predictions. Just as clear and meaningful as Q.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.