[David Chase]

No.

A troll is someone QTards disagree with or someone who doesn’t buy into their kookiness.

I used a direct quote from Ransomnote.

I commented on it.
No profanity.
No name calling (like you do).

That’s the definition of what everyone does here. Read threads and comment.

I understand you being a Q Follower will get upset over someone not playing your conspiracy spy game.

But it doesn’t give you the right to call me a disrupter when I’m not doing anything different than anyone else on FreeRepublic.

You should consider applying for a job with Twitter.......you’ve got the central theme down to an art.....”Free speech for me but not for thee”.

[grey_whiskers]

Look at the very language in your post

"A troll is someone QTards disagree with" and then you said "no name calling (like you do)".

You're a liar: the very word QTards *is* name calling.

Then you doubled down with "I understand you being a Q Follower will get upset over someone not playing your conspiracy spy game."

The very words "conspiracy spy game" are all lies, but they achieve their effect on the reader through implanting negative associations though devoid of substantive contents.

And the casual air with which you do it, shows you are using well-known psy-op techniques for disrupting threads.

For the comment on ransomnote's posting?

You wrote "I don’t feel bad that you don’t feel bad. Because if we think someone or some group is lying, we don’t need any of that silly old proof.

Because they’re liars."

Again, classic discredit through lying through your teeth, strawmen, and all the rest.

Because you were replying to a post with multiple independent links covering the evidence that the CDC has been lying:

but you implied in response, that the claims CDC was lying were pulled out of thin air, without evidence. Meanwhile definition shifting by changing the standard to "proof" which was not even claimed by ransomnote.

You deserve not an iota of credence, and should be removed from the thread.

[bagster]

A troll is someone QTards disagree with or someone who doesn’t buy into their kookiness.

Deceptive, dishonest people and liars warp the meaning of words and make up their own definitions.

The original definition of the word 'troll' from when it was first invented was someone who would put out a piece of bait in an online social environment that was intended to gain a negative reaction, cause anger or disruption.

Then old people started doing the internet and people like you changed the meaning to anybody that says something you don't like.

So, you lie, bend the truth to justify your trolling self, and either play dumb or are dumb.

Here is an incident of trolling in the classicals sense. Posted on the Q thread by someone who has a history of sh*t talking Q and Q researchers (patriots).

People are on to you, new guy. Time for another name change.