Replies

Quite the disrespectful comment from you too. I wouldn’t call you a clown. However I might say you’re living in Bazarro World if you think it is nice to call someone on these boards a clown. Save that for the Leftnicks their fellow travelers like Biden.

What should be the value in our posts about such scientific studies is our understanding of what it said. This study by Harvard and MIT is on a theoretical level that I found hard to follow. What it failed to suggest is the vaccines being used to fight the C-virus will not be threatened if the theory is proven true. I received further assurance from the article with this:

“Dr Baltimore told media, “Because it is all pieces of the coronaviral genome, it can’t lead to infectious RNA or DNA and therefore it is probably biologically a dead end. It is also not clear if, in people, the cells that harbor the reverse transcripts stay around for a long time or they die. The work raises a lot of interesting questions.”

Let’s wait until the research is concluded before jumping to false, Bazarro World, conclusions.

Let’s wait until the research is concluded before jumping to false, Bazarro World, conclusions.

Or, let's test it in the real world on human guinea pigs, right?

Cause that's what we're doing.

Talk about Bizarro world.

Quite the disrespectful comment from you too. I wouldn’t call you a clown. However I might say you’re living in Bazarro World if you think it is nice to call someone on these boards a clown.

Indeed it was. Disrespect for disrespect, my mama always said. Check Atreides first post for more information.

This stuff has world changing impact. I left 'nice' in my other pants. But tell me. Is it nice to go along with a program that we KNOW is part of the same program (both foreign and domestic) that gave us this bio-weapon in the first place? That gave control of our foreign government to a government and people that do NOT have our best interests at heart?

Are the Chinese being 'nice'? Are their democrat/derp state domestic allies being 'nice'?

If the answer is no, what does that say about the CLOWNS on our own side who don't have the sense God gave little green apples and are falling for this abomination, pushing it on the rest of us, and squelching honest people's voices who question their designs?

It says they are not only clowns, but much worse. They are unknowing and unwitting useful idiot clowns, and a clear and imminent danger to the survival of America as we used to know it. They are an infection on the body politic.

So, yea. I'm not nice.

But neither are the clowns that would silence debate and the free flow of information.

But you go on being 'nice' if that works for you.

#ItsNiceToBeNiceToTheNice

Goodness knows I should take my own advice some of the time, but it’s always an option to just scroll on by a FReeper’s comments that you don’t believe you’ll ever agree with on the issues, etc.

And bagster makes it easy to do. He has graciously included a beautiful yellow smiling face in his posts. Once you see that beacon of yellow, you can just scroll by that post without giving it more thought.

I admit I do use that yellow, smiling face to either stop and read or scroll on by. Mostly the latter, as he uses words that I just don’t understand.

Just a thought.

Top Kek.

Why mandatory jabs with mRNA (not a vaccine, despite the deliberate lying-through-their-foul-teeth deliberate misuse of the word "vaccine"), when

a) prior animal experiments with animals, led to the deaths of all animals who received the mRNA jab upon subsequent infection with the viruses the jab was supposed to help with
b) people/groups to include Nobelists in related areas such as Luc Montaigner and Kary Mullis, and specialists in vaccination such as Geert Vanden Bossche of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and now groups at Harvard and MIT, are talking about disregarded or unplanned side effects, or systemic flaws in the very methods used to track the "pandemic"
c) Bill Gates has before now both stated an interest in human depopulation, and has screwed the pooch with his "vaccinations" in the past in both India and Africa causing everything from sterility, to the very disease the individual vaccination was supposed to prevent, to death (and he's a computer guy who couldn't even keep his own operating system free from viruses, and a college dropout to boot, let alone a Medical Doctor or virologist)
d) and all the induced frenzy of everything from lockdowns, to overthrowing the election (mail in ballots), to taking out small businesses, for a virus with a cumulative fatality rate of maybe 0.2%-0.4%, and that mostly among the elderly with significant co-morbidities

e) You yourself admit (and I quote) "This study by Harvard and MIT is on a theoretical level that I found hard to follow."

So you admit you don't know WTF you're talking about, and you brush aside all concerns as merely the deranged rantings of the easily-led ignorant?

Talk about projection.