Jan_Sobieski wrote:
Can you restate how you think vaccine development companies created a vaccine without an isolated virus?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've wondered how they did it.
As of July 2020 the CDC was saying that the isolate was unavailable. Note that in the first line of my post above, I use the word 'exist' where I should have used 'available'. Elsewhere in the thread post, I confirm I know the Covid-19 existance by saying I think it's a bioweapon and noting the properties it shares with the vacinne mRNA and HIV virus.
I have read/heard physicians and researchers complaints that isolated samples were still unavailable.
I've been trying to figure out how why this could happen. I think the CDC may be 'awarding' samples to favored researchers/organizations.
We know things about the virus, like it has fragments of HIV, and can upload it's sequence into the host's DNA. At the same time, some Dr's and researchers were denied requested samples, and being told none were available. Therefore, I wonder if the doctors/researchers denied samples are calling the CDC's bluff with taunts and digs about the virus not existing with the intention of provoking a release of samples "Put up, or shut up."
Lately I'm finding articles saying that the creation of the vaccines spike protein, which is coded by the RNA sequence, is based on China's Covid-19 genome. This means we are 'taking China's word for it' and selecting a sequence of the genome to build our mRNA vaccines. I don't think we have reason to trust China's genome.
Now, in the human trials they say they expose people to the virus but I don't know the method of exposure or if the vaccine companies are being honest (more about that below).
I don't trust the CDC's assertions about the availability of isolates after catching them lying to the nation and harming public health.
I've encountered many accounts of denied requests for it. I know the CDC revises their website freely to alter the narrative so I can't really rely on them as a source. I will need to find sources other than the vaccine companies and the CDC to find out if/when sources of isolated Covid-19 virus are available and what criteria may/may not drive their selection of recipients.
I don't feel bad about not having proof because the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers are definitely lying about so much, they really can't expect me to take their word for it. All negative information about the Covid-19 planned-demic and vaccines is being purged, so we fall back to secondary sources and then those doing the purging ridicule us for relying on secondary sources or struggles to find valid information at all.
The current censorship is removing access to anything but the 'narrative' and the narrative is tragically false (needless shutdown, masks, concealing vaccine risks etc.)
Of greater concern to me is that some of the vaccine trials appear to be faked or modified to prove what they want it to prove, so I am not convinced that they actually exposed people to Covid-19 in the trials yet.
The vaccine manufactures' designed their human trials to diagnose Covid-19 based on the presence of at lest one Covid-19 related symptom (many are common to other illnesses like the flu) and the PCR test. But the PCR does not indicate the presence of the virus, it indicates the presence of a sequence of molecules found in many different things, like motor oil, fruit, goats etc. Here's a thread that provides the details about the impossible way the vaccine companies manage to get data which supports their products using the PCR, which does not test for the virus, but tests for the matirals from a variety of many different sources.
For just information about the invalidity of the PCR, the article by Dr Mike Yeadon, the former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd., would be faster:
The ramifications of the continuing deception re Covid-19, and the reliance on the PCR (by Fauci, vaccine companies) are tremendously damaging. How am I to trust what these same say about who received what samples, if the samples were the the same Covid-19 identified elsehwere, or if they tell us they subjected trial participants to the live virus.
The Covid-19 vaccine trials can't be valid based on an invalid test for Covid-19.
Right now, people that I follow have higher credibility than Fauci and the vaccine companies. I am going to try to track down places I previously found complaints that researchers were denied samples and look for updates - because the CDC and Vaccine makers are lying on an epic scale at this point so they aren't a valid source of information.
