Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Karl Popper vs. global warming: "Climate Change" isn't science at all by Popper's standards. It's an unproved assertion that CO2-drives global warming, conveniently lacking any means of falsification
American Thinker ^ | 03/20/2021 | Jay Hendon

Posted on 03/20/2021 4:27:16 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Karl Popper, one of the 20th century's most influential philosophers of science, argued against classical inductivist reasoning in science. He argued that a scientific hypothesis must be falsifiable -- similar to the statistician's practice of proving the null case rather than the hypotheses itself.

Questioning the claim of human-made climate change, I am often dismissed as a "denier" and asked why I don't accept that in this particular arena, "the science is settled."

But anthropogenic global warming (AGW) a.k.a. "climate change" isn't science at all by Popper's standards and is, in fact, a perfect example of that which Popper rejected: pseudoscience founded on an unproved assertion that CO2-drives global warming, conveniently lacking any means of falsification, which has led to the widespread erroneous belief that Earth is warming (only on the computer models), that CO2 is the driver of that warming (occasional correlation, definitely not cause), that computer models can substitute for actual temperature readings (making the data match the theory, i.e., Kierkegaard's "covetous eye on the outcome") and that we presently have a climate crisis to deal with.

To quote Voltaire: "If anyone can make you believe an absurdity, they can make you commit a tragedy." It is indeed tragic that public information, public education, public funds, and energy policy are all informed by an unscientific claim disguised in the garb of science that has -- to date -- been neither proved nor falsified. In truth, it isn't science but agenda-driven environmental zealotry, fostered by politicized junk science with an incredible history of failed predictions that should be setting off human BS detectors across the globe.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Society; Weather
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; karlpopper; pseudoscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Texas Eagle

Surely you jest with that question.

If that’s not sarcasm, you have no business commenting on climate & CO2. There are MANY papers which outline the facts; you need only have the will to find them.


21 posted on 03/20/2021 9:31:44 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jkazak54

Hey man, I don’t think you get it.


22 posted on 03/21/2021 10:25:38 AM PDT by BEJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Richard Feynman

The Essence Of Science In 61 Seconds

23 posted on 03/22/2021 9:12:48 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson