Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study finds evidence of 55 new chemicals in people
phys.org ^ | MARCH 17, 2021 | University of California, San Francisco

Posted on 03/18/2021 8:54:15 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Scientists at UC San Francisco have detected 109 chemicals in a study of pregnant women, including 55 chemicals never before reported in people and 42 "mystery chemicals," whose sources and uses are unknown.

The chemicals most likely come from consumer products or other industrial sources. They were found both in the blood of pregnant women, as well as their newborn children, suggesting they are traveling through the mother's placenta.

"These chemicals have probably been in people for quite some time, but our technology is now helping us to identify more of them...It is alarming that we keep seeing certain chemicals travel from pregnant women to their children, which means these chemicals can be with us for generations,"

"These new technologies are promising in enabling us to identify more chemicals in people, but our study findings also make clear that chemical manufacturers need to provide analytical standards so that we can confirm the presence of chemicals and evaluate their toxicity,"

The 109 chemicals researchers found in the blood samples from pregnant women and their newborns are found in many different types of products. For example, 40 are used as plasticizers, 28 in cosmetics, 25 in consumer products, 29 as pharmaceuticals, 23 as pesticides, 3 as flame retardants, and 7 are PFAS compounds, which are used in carpeting, upholstery, and other applications. The researchers say it's possible there are also other uses for all of these chemicals.

The researchers report that 55 of the 109 chemicals they tentatively identified appear not to have been previously reported in people:

(Excerpt) Read more at phys.org ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Leep

“Can’t biden sign a EO that eliminates them?”

...Xiden only signs EO’s that cause complete economic disaster.


21 posted on 03/18/2021 9:37:22 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The thing is they know that alumina is a great reflector. They have been working on this for some time now. They have also tested other chemicals to see if they would be great candidates to block out the sun.

Not only are we loading up on this stuff, but when the sun cannot peek through our atmosphere, all plant and animal life suffers as a result. Bee decline? Dying trees in the forest? You name it.

The result is that their experiments are killing us and the planet. You'd think Gates would be happy just to vaxx us to death.

22 posted on 03/18/2021 9:47:35 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

{rimshot}


23 posted on 03/18/2021 9:49:48 AM PDT by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

They are “novel” chemicals because we haven’t identified them before. They may have been around for a while, but we are just now noticing they are different than ones we’ve detected previously.

I liken it to discovering a “new” animal. Is it really a “new” species that just popped up spontaneously, or is just that we haven’t noticed all the nuanced differences before now? I tend to think it’s the latter, but of course, I’m no expert.


24 posted on 03/18/2021 9:50:30 AM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?
I saw the 55 and thought Biden was going to change the speed limit.

Don’t give him any ideas. I can just see him (or his puppetmasters): “{PERK!} Something else to inflict misery! Let’s do it!”

25 posted on 03/18/2021 9:52:49 AM PDT by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

*** So these are not “new chemicals” in our bodies, but “new technology” is now able to detect them.***

Tada!! Exactly what I’m thinking!

Reminds me of using new technology to discover many of the pathogens that we are surrounded by, as well as helpful microorganisms.


26 posted on 03/18/2021 9:55:46 AM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A year from now we will see over 100 new chemicals when the vaccines mRNA get to work in our human bodies.


27 posted on 03/18/2021 10:15:08 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

54 of them are probably from vaccines. 😕


28 posted on 03/18/2021 10:16:38 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
And we wonder why we have cancers

I've been saying for years that not just cancer but things like autism have ascended so rapidly for the same reasons. We transitioned over to plastic for so much back in the 1970s, and since then, we've seen a massive uptick in cancer and other anomalous mental diseases.

29 posted on 03/18/2021 10:26:07 AM PDT by rarestia (Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

30 posted on 03/18/2021 10:27:26 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The chemicals are coming to get us...LOOK OUT!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!

31 posted on 03/18/2021 10:35:57 AM PDT by montag813 ("Fallen, fallen, is Babylon the Great")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

All of life is chemistry

Indeed just think of all the things the cave man tried here grog eat this it’ll make you feel better and it expanded from there.


32 posted on 03/18/2021 10:49:44 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
So these are not “new chemicals” in our bodies, but “new technology” is now able to detect them.

Bingo - as detection methods can identify down to "parts per billionths" you will eventually find everything in our bodies.

And there is no shortage of breathless "scientists" hoping to grab some microphone/camera opportunities.

33 posted on 03/18/2021 10:50:30 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
"grog"

~~~


34 posted on 03/18/2021 10:58:48 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: z3n

YEP


35 posted on 03/18/2021 11:25:15 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I can’t have 55.


36 posted on 03/18/2021 11:46:26 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Biology = Chemistry = Physics


37 posted on 03/18/2021 12:19:17 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Not for all


38 posted on 03/19/2021 7:47:56 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson