Your enthusiasm hasn't motivated me to read anything.
I understand what the definition of "anomalous heating" is.
Did all 153 experiments detect neutrons, or none of them, or some of them? That's a pretty simple question.
Similarly, did all 153 experiments depend upon palladium loaded with deuterium? That too is a pretty simple questions.
If you understand the definition, they why do you ask?
Read the documents for yourself. I aint gonna spoonfeed ya.
Your seagullness hasn’t motivated me to treat me with anything but disdain. So we’re at an impasse.
You should keep in mind the rules for FR. Per JimRob, it applies to EVERY topic.
Do not badger other posters. Do not demand an answer. Do not enter a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, insult the regulars, etc.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts