If you understand the definition, they why do you ask?
Read the documents for yourself. I aint gonna spoonfeed ya.
I didn't ask you for the definition of "anomalous heating". I did ask you whether your reference to the "P & F effect" included ONLY anomalous heating.
If you tell me that all 153 experiments all used deuterium loaded palladium and that all or none detected neutrons, then I might consider going to your link.
Otherwise, I will assume that we really don't understand yet what is going on and that there does not exist a single, repeatable scientific experiment that establishes anything certain.
I am quite confident that considerably more than 153 attempts at establishing a "P & F effect" have been made in the last thirty years. Science does not allow discounting "unsuccessful" experiments as being meaningless. Were 10,000 experiments performed and about 153 showed "anomalous heating"? It wouldn't surprise me.
I simply asked a few simple questions about which experiment produces "anomalous heating" with scientific certainty. Perhaps none of them do.