Eight rounds? They are going to need more fencing and concertina wire.
Meanwhile, 100 DeMarcus and Jaquans were arrested with AK-47’s and a ton of dope, and it didn’t make the news.
So, a 2012 second degree theft conviction equals lifetime gun ban.
Anyone else believe that law needs to disappear?
Anyone else believe that law is nothing more than an effort to ban guns, or provide as many prohibited persons as the law can manufacture.
The same could be said of the law that demands the same from a misdemeanor conviction for spouse abuse, or any other idea contrary to “Shall NOT be infringed” but is in every sense of the word infringed.
I ought to know the history of said law, as I believe it will prove helpful in knowing the reasoning behind it’s passage and who in the Congress voted for it.
You can learn a great deal here: https://www.atf.gov/firearms/identify-prohibited-persons You can also study the three major laws, the 1934, 1968, and 1986 Congressional acts where most if not all of the prohibitions come from. All of them designed to chip away at Shall Not be infringed.
If I am not mistaken all of the Law against shall not be infringed is unconstitutional and should be dealt with appropriately, as in nullified and ignored until taken off the books. In addition, the amount of work dedicated by law enforcement pursuing said offenders should be looked at to determine how much effort is spent investigating little fish while the big fish enjoy their immunity just because.
Lastly, the NRA has been around for everyone of those acts designed to remove gun rights from as many people as possible. The effort continues to this day when those gun loving democrats the NRA has been giving A ratings to are now in charge of the entirety of the Federal Government.
All of these groups should re-package themselves as legitimate self-defense groups - against the apocalypse. Instead of referring to 3%ers, MAGA, bugaloo, they are ZORTs (zombie outbreak response teams).
So when do the leftist Kenosha felons possessing firearms in the rittenhouse event get charged?
::crickets::
So, did I miss the point at which FBI got involved and found out that there was a straw purchase for the receiver? Why were they executing the search warrant in the first place? What flagged it?
Guess who won’t be released from prison because of Covid
The girlfriend purchased the lower receiver. As far as the ATF knew, this was a legal purchase.
Then Frank Perry purchased items online to finish the firearm. All those items were legal for Frank to purchase. He had them sent to his girlfriend's house.
It appears, though we do not know for certain, that data mining linked Frank's name to the Boogaloo movement, then linked to his conviction in 2012, then linked to his purchase of firearm related items and parts, sent to his girlfriend's house.
Finally, it appears they linked the purchase of the lower receiver, by the girlfriend, in order to make the case.
Where did they obtain probable cause to have a search warrant issued?
My best guess is they went to the girlfriend and broke her, (pretty easy) and used her testimony to get the warrant.
It would be very useful to know how they got the warrant.
The whole setup of the article was a waste of time until the last sentence. Felon in possession of a firearm. Absolutely none of the rest of it was illegal.
A flashlight? A fancy rope they call a sling? A placement? lubricating oil?
Why would ANYONE, who expected a civil war to happen, continue to live in Baltimore, MD or ANY big city? This is just proof to me that this is a Fed.gov sting operation. Nobody can be this stupid. Can they?
“Boogaloo”
First time I ever heard that word was from a black Airman in the USAF back in 1968.
He said he was going to go into town and “Boogaloo all weekend”.
From the way he said it I believe it had something to do with the women in town.
...he was also found to be in possession of a pop tart bitten into the shape of an assault Glock fully automatic pistol.