[GQuagmire]

Feel free to discuss, argue, dismiss etc. I’m killing time before flight this afternoon

[\/\/ayne]

Just what we need, another Communist President.

[Rurudyne]

No. His father was not a US citizen when he was born. He is not a NBC just as Obama and Cruz are not NBC.

[humor] he’s a BBC [/humor].

[Ninaq]

His father is not an American citizen, a requirement.

[Spirit of Liberty]

I guess he’s just as eligible as Winston Churchill would have been.

Which means, not.

[rktman]

Put your mask back on! LOL! No more flyin’ for me. No need thankfully. Anyway, I guess the ‘royals’ need to weigh in based on the tint involved. :-)

[moovova]

Will they change his name to George III?

[bigbob]

Sure, anyone is eligible, as Obama proved and as our current VP will soon re-affirm.

Disagree? Who’s going to stop her, the Supreme Court?

[FormerFRLurker]

I don’t have a title or professional security either. Where’s my victim card?

[babble-on]

I have the official source here, and it says he’s eligible, but would have to do a few things.

“Because Archie was born to a U.S. citizen, he is considered a “natural born citizen” and could run for the country’s highest office — but he’d need to jump through some hoops. Archie would have to go through a naturalization proceeding and need special permission from Congress.” PEOPLE Magazine, February 2021

[Leaning Right]

Since we’re wildly speculating...Archie is seventh in line to the British throne. So how about this? It’s possible that some day he could be the President of the United States AND the King of England.

Oops! I think I just broke a royal edict.

[Gay State Conservative]

If he ran as a Rat of course he would be.If he ran as a Republican we all know the answer.

[taxcontrol]

Under current interpretation of US law, if he is born on US soil, he is a natural born citizen. If he is born on non-US soil to at least 1 US citizen at the time of his birth, he is a natural born citizen.

Background -
The Constitution specificly enumerates Congress with the power to set the rules of naturalization. That includes who requires naturalization as well as those that do not.

The current code (will) of Congress is expressed in USC title 8 section 1401 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401)

Others on this forum express other opinions. I try to avoid opinion and point to specific law.

[9YearLurker]

Will there be a US in 35 years?

[MHGinTN]

As a republicant, no. As a Demonrat, always because there are no rules for radicals.

[DoodleDawg]

Yes.

[Reno89519]

The inbred monarchy has no business being in the US. The poor kid might have US citizenship via mommy but he is no more qualified than anchor baby Harris, Lyn’ Ted, Little Marco, and other spawn of non-citizen, not born in American kids.

[I cannot think of a name]

THE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY WOULD NEVER BE STUPID ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR SUCH A............

oh wait, never mind.

[Salman]

Silly man. By the time he's old enough, there won't be a United States.

Maybe he'll convert to Islam so he can be King of England.

[Terry L Smith]

No. Mama was not inside CONUS at time of birth!!

[DoodleDawg]

Birther thread. Oh goody.