Related to this, I think claims were put forward that cheating took place in about 10 different ways. I suspect that just 1 or 2 of those ways really made the difference.
“Hey,” people said, “We should investigate those 10 ways they cheated.”
And so the “official people” said, “OK, we can investigate the 8 or 9 ways they cheated. There. Done. We looked at the 8 ways they may have cheated, and none of them were significant.”
“No, no, no,” people said, “We need to look at all 10 ways. Because I think 1 or 2 of them may have been significant.”
“Well, I’m telling you, we already looked at the 8 ways. But we can look at those 8 ways again, if it makes you feel any better. There. Done. We checked out the 8 ways they may have cheated. And we have debunked any notion that they may have cheated.”
“8 ways? What about the other 2? Shouldn’t we investigate everything?”
“But we did. Go away.”
The ones accuse of doing the cheating are the ones doing the investigations. Very third world.