[WildHighlander57]

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained#:~:text=An%20Emergency%20Use%20Authorization%20(,COVID%2D19%20pandemic.

Note “ no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. “ in the section

“What is an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)?”

Being that the FDA gave EUA to the vaccines, it means that there weren’t any alternatives.

[agere_contra]

Being that the FDA gave EUA to the vaccines, it means that there weren’t any alternatives.

That's ... unusually credulous even for FR.

The FDA is a corrupt political organisation, and the approval process for treatments has become corrupted and politicised.

Issuance of a EUA can be extremely lucrative (and will certainly be so for a COVID treatment) - but relies on there being no other *approved* treatment.

And so - by the power of naked corruption - no treatments are approved. The FDA just stonewalls effective treatments such as the MATH+ protocol, ivermectin or HCQ + Zinc + azithromycin.

There is an appalling human cost. Thousands of people have unnecessarily died of Covid because of the FDA.

[SecAmndmt]

“Being that the FDA gave EUA to the vaccines, it means that there weren’t any alternatives.”

Got it. Makes perfect sense now.

So denial of therapeutic treatment at hospitals is as imagined: to promote the vaccines under EUA.