Posted on 03/03/2021 4:48:45 AM PST by MtnClimber
A successful conspiracy should be limited in the number of people involved. They must be highly intelligent and free from the need to feed their ego by revealing how important they are. The events surrounding the Jan. 6 "insurrection" met none of these criteria. Hundreds of organizations were involved, and responsible officials contradicted each other.
The approved narrative: Because Donald Trump falsely claimed that the election was stolen, he incited his white supremacist followers to invade the Capitol in an attempt to overthrow the government. Sen. Gary Peters described it as a "direct attack on our democracy." This provided proof that white supremacists were a real threat. It also eclipsed the BLM and Antifa riot bad press. The FBI reported that there was no indication that individuals associated with Antifa disguised themselves among pro-Trump supporters in order to provoke the mob at the U.S. Capitol. Reason magazine admitted there was a single one but, "the existence of one person vaguely connected to antifa does not establish that antifa was ultimately culpable for what transpired."
The disturbance at the Capitol on Jan. 6 is routinely described as a “deadly insurrection.” The riots that took place during the summer and caused between 1 and 2 billion dollars in damage and at least 17 deaths are described as "peaceful." The only death that can be attributed directly to the violence on Jan. 6 was the death of a woman shot by police in violation of any law enforcement's rules of engagement. It is clear that the government and the Deep State media are not giving an accurate picture of what took place.
You did not need a crystal ball to know that violent groups would use the gathering to promote violence.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Thanks for the post ETL. But, the FBI (Christopher Wray) stated recently that they found no other groups involved in the Capitol incursion except Trump supporters. The FBI is not budging from the official narrative.
Lol!
Well, I guess THAT settles THAT!
/SARC
The definition of an “insurrection” to democrats and the treason media is someone who moves Nancy Pelosis lecturn 8 feet while Anifa burning the Federal court in Portland for the past year is not an insurrection.
They will run and hide. A lot of people in the bunker begging for it to stop. If they keep pushing gun control they will have more than 75 million not happy. I do think more proof of the election fraud will surface along with biden laptop info.
Gary Peters... didn't he pitch for the White Sox back in the 60s?
ff
"They're not going to stop," she said.
"This is a movement, I'm telling you, they're not going to stop, and everyone beware because they're not going to stop before Election Day in November, and they're not going to stop after Election Day.
And everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they're not going to let up, and they should not, and we should not.”
"...a longer version of the exchange posted by the 'Late Show' shows Harris saying that the protests continuing is "critically important" to achieve change.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________
And I could be speaking ... figuratively. I could be speaking literally.
It’s a matter of interpretation. ...”
—Victor Garcia | Fox News | June 24, 2020
___________________________________________
I’ll believe it was an insurrection when they start charging people with insurrection.
Exactly. This supposed insurrection was carried out by people whose average age was probably 40, who went unarmed, and who went home before dark as told to. Quite an "insurrection".
It was more like Black Friday at Walmart.
It’s extraordinary how many Dems seem to actually believe the propaganda media’s made-up slander narrative that makes no sense at all. The Dems have conditioned their people to believe anything officials and “journalists” say, especially about their political enemies whom they’ve been taught to hate, fear, and demonize. The Dems are not just the party of collectivism; they are the party of group think.
Thank you. That’s some really good stuff you’ve put out.
I was there, it wasn’t quite as bad at Black Friday at Walmart.
You’re welcome.
Glad you found it useful.
Gosh that brings back memories.
Like seeing Bernadine Rae Dohrn’s stupid face on the wall every day in the post office.
And reading about the bombings/robberies/murders all through the ‘70s.
Or seeing Lurch anguishing about Vietnam, the environment, oil, whatever...he was phony then and worse now.
Just so happy to have them all back in our faces.
Not.
Sorry if it brought back bad memories. But the aim was to show that these very same communist-revolutionary SOBs from the 60s and 70s are working with the communist groups of today. Clearly, not many people are aware of the this, as you really don’t hear it mentioned anywhere. There are only a few guests that come on Fox News who get into details like this. And they mainly are law enforcement folks who dealt with the bastards at the time.
Well, it wasn't violent and it wasn't a riot, other than that, it's a perfect description.
+1
I was there also and I agree with your observation. I could tell there were some people going in by the cheering at the west side of the Capitol. But 699,900 of the 700,000 were just mulling around outside of the grounds. It felt anticlimactic at the Capitol after the big rally, Trump’s speech, and the march to the Capitol. Plus, it had already been a pretty long day and the cold weather was wearing people down.
I recorded about an hour of the march from the White House to the Capitol. I posted this once before on Free Republic. Here’s the YouTube link: https://youtu.be/cUuZecb4U8k
Here’s the same video on Rumble: https://rumble.com/vcldrt-july-6th-election-protest-march-to-the-capitol.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.