Sue.
Exactly. As representatives of the state, it is patently unconstitutional for the university to sensor him for stating his opinion and the truth.
“Sue”?
Is Sue a Man or a Woman?
/S
Since this is a taxpayer-funded university, a state actor at the university has allegedly abridged a student’s constitutionally enumerated right to free speech imo, which is prohibited by Section 1 of 14th Amendment (14A).
Excerpted from the 14th Amendment:
"Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
Consider that people won a 14A-related case against UC Berkeley awhile back for the same reason.
(12.4.18, that’s 2018) UC Berkeley settles landmark free speech lawsuit, will pay $70,000 to conservative group
The problem is that Owen Stevens, if he is a U.S. citizen, may not necessarily know that 14A exists.
I suspect that another problem is that taxpayers may have paid the settlement in the U.C. Berkeley case, likewise with a 2nd Amendment-related case in Los Angeles.
L.A. Ordered to Pay NRA Six Figures After Losing First Amendment Case (2.27.21)
“Sue.”
And sue BIGLY, and do them a real job.