Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jdsteel

The U.S. Constitution clearly says that state legislatures have the authority to determine the method for appointing presidential electors. Why would the Supreme Court take this case at all instead of leaving the blame for the 2020 election fiasco right where it belongs — with the state legislatures?


42 posted on 02/23/2021 6:35:02 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

“Why would the Supreme Court take this case at all instead of leaving the blame for the 2020 election fiasco right where it belongs — with the state legislatures?”

Because the Supreme Court is there for suits that rise above the level of the State Supreme Courts.

In PA the election laws are written into the Constitution. Election laws were modified as a result of a lawsuit (NOT the State Legislature) and the PA SC ruled to move ahead with those changes. That is blatantly unconstitutional from what is written in the PA Constitution. The SCOTUS is the place to take that suit next according to the US Constitution.

They punted....unconstitutionally so.


47 posted on 02/23/2021 9:10:43 AM PST by jdsteel ("A Republic, Madam, if you can keep it." Sorry Ben, looks like we blew it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson