Anyone want to kick in $5.00 to help me start up “FIRST SECOND AMENDMENT BANK AND TRUST”? or “First Second Amendment Credit Union”. Just sayin’...........
Get a cash advance from the CC and buy your gun. They’ll never know.
Sounds like Restraint of Trade to me. Someone needs to take these people to Court.
Just a general question....Although I know banks are private independent companies......
If a bank refused to give loans to a single race (regardless of color) they would be in violation of the Constitution and banking laws.
If a bank refused to give loans to a specific religion (regardless of type) they would be in violation of the Constitution and banking laws.
If a bank refuses to give a loan strictly based on a legally held right in the constitution such as the 2nd Amendment, why are they not in violation of the Constitution and banking law?
Fire away! (pun intended)
So many people keep getting it wrong.
We don’t have a “second amendment right,” just as we don’t have a “first amendment right.”
We have Natural Rights endowed to us by our Creator. The Bill of Rights, most specifically the First and Second Amendments, recognizes that as fact, and places restrictions on the government from infringing on those Natural Rights.
We need to start our own banks. Really start own own industries.
“So how, as gun rights supporters, can we navigate the waters of the activist financial industry?”
Run your dollars through a cryptocurrency exchange, like Kraken. Buy bitcoin. Convert the bitcoin to dollars at the exchange. Send dollars from the exchange to the fiat bank.
As long as you’ve followed the KYC (Know your customer) rules with the exchange, you are 100% legal, and there’s not a thing fiat banks can do to stop it.
Here’s a novel idea. Just pull out all monies within these establishments since they want to act like heathens then watch them scream uncle.
Interesting, but the article is written AssBackwards. Pro gun people are looking for the Best Banks. This article presents a list of Banks calling them the worst with F ratings, etc. And only when you get further into the text you realize that the “worst” is actually referring the Best for Pro 2nd Amendment people and his list is actually the worst Banks for the Gun Control Grabbers. Wouldn’t have just been simpler and more logical to give the Best Banks for Firearms Owners and list the Worst Banks for Gun Business Last? This writer has added nothing but unnecessary confusion to the issue.