Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/19/2021 7:44:34 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger
The scientists found that only minute amounts of DNA remained in the samples and that the DNA was degraded into very small fragments.

So...nothing they could use to create a living mammoth. Too bad.
2 posted on 02/19/2021 7:46:53 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The more they find, the less they actually know. So goes the study of Anthropology...


6 posted on 02/19/2021 8:59:19 AM PST by Democrat = party of treason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
An educated guess would be that we could recover DNA that is two million years old, and possibly go even as far back as 2.6 million. Before that, there was no permafrost where ancient DNA could have been preserved,” says Anders Götherström, a professor in molecular archaeology and joint research leader at the Centre for Palaeogenetics.

No permafrost? Global warming from Fred Flintstone's SUV, no doubt!

7 posted on 02/19/2021 9:33:11 AM PST by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I saw those three woolly mammoths pass the house just yesterday.


9 posted on 02/19/2021 9:52:23 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

COVID genome


10 posted on 02/19/2021 1:26:15 PM PST by SERE_DOC ( The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson