Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS to Hear Election Fraud Cases for Pennsylvania, Michigan & Georgia
NN ^ | 02-14-21 | Jay Greenberg

Posted on 02/14/2021 8:18:43 AM PST by McQ444

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: McQ444

Nothing like waiting until it no longer matters. Thanks Brett the party boy. Thanks Amy Conehead Barrett. Thanks Gorsuch.


41 posted on 02/14/2021 8:43:38 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

SCOTUS to Hear Election Fraud Cases for Pennsylvania, Michigan & Georgia

Not sure they have the will to reclaim their credibility.


42 posted on 02/14/2021 8:44:03 AM PST by JayAr36 (My disgust with government is complete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

Supine Court of the US.


43 posted on 02/14/2021 8:45:01 AM PST by matthew fuller (Corn Pop needs popping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

Whaaaaaat? I thought they refused to even look at the evidence!


44 posted on 02/14/2021 8:45:13 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
-- Aren't they only considering whether to hear them at this point? --

Depends on what you mean by "hearing" the case.

The process of dealing with a case has two clear places that in casual vernacular are called "refused to hear" or "refused to decide."

The first, in time, is when a party files a petition or a claim before SCOTUS. These petitions are long, detailed petitions that explain why SCOTUS should take the case. 99% of the time SCOTUS reads these, then says "we will hear no more." Petition denied, "cert denied" in the vernacular.

The second is after the court agrees to hear more. There are more filings, often but not always some oral argument. That's where these cases are, procedurally. Cert was granted.

But even after hearing the case, SCOTUS may declare that it lacks jurisdiction. That's what it did in Marbury v. Madison. Did it hear the case? Did it decide the case? Those are rhetorical questions. People will argue the Q&A, rhetorically, but it doesn't matter. Marbury didn't get the relief he wanted.

45 posted on 02/14/2021 8:47:26 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

These election fraud cases get dismissed because they’re either too soon when an election has not yet occurred, or too late because the election is over.


46 posted on 02/14/2021 8:47:44 AM PST by Flick Lives (“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

The whole thing was and is twisted. They should have looked at the evidence in the first place and did something about it. But so should the judges that punted.


47 posted on 02/14/2021 8:47:58 AM PST by glimmerman70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

AT MOST the USSC will order changes to state election procedures.

There is no way in hell anything beyond that occurs. The Electoral College and congress are the supreme power when it comes to presidential elections.


48 posted on 02/14/2021 8:48:40 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

B.F.D.


49 posted on 02/14/2021 8:49:23 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale
-- Always amused when decent people expect justice from the institution that legalized abortion and gay marriage. --

Hallucinated right into the constitution.

These institutions are evil and literally insane.

50 posted on 02/14/2021 8:50:24 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

Justice delayed is justice denied.


51 posted on 02/14/2021 8:51:33 AM PST by Be Free (When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

“At this point what difference does it make?”


52 posted on 02/14/2021 8:51:40 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If that happens it would be significant & importantt for the future. The remaining question is “ Do the state governments there have the guts to enforce it.”


53 posted on 02/14/2021 8:52:06 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Be Free
Bingo.

And here's a prediction: The USSC will once again rule against each case due to lack of standing and not wanting to overturn an election citing lack of precedence for doing so.

This is nothing but bread and circuses for the masses.

54 posted on 02/14/2021 8:53:10 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

The Michigan Secretary of State just declared that the fraudulent audit of the fraudulent election result “proves” that there was no electoral fraud; zero, zilch, nada.

The corrupt and derelict USSC wil undoubtedly rule the same thing on any case of any kind that they decide to put on for political theatre.

Disgusting, reprehensible, prevaricating, duplicitous, lying liars, each and every one of these repugnant basterds. The USA is so over!


55 posted on 02/14/2021 8:56:07 AM PST by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36

We view the courts as politics. However, in reality the majority of cases that go before SCOTUS are antiseptic exercises in law and precedent.

FACT - the conduct of the election in these states was unconstitutional under both state and federal law. State officials acknowledged the merits, but said it was because of “Covid”. How does that jibe with sentiment from the courts that the virus does not overturn the constitution?

These cases will be interesting. Forget all the Sidney Powell/Lin Wood stuff. You would need a massive investigation by DOJ to prove those and it will not happen.

The cases that made it are well reasoned and pointed arguments regarding the constitutionality and conduct of the elections.

None of us know what will happen now. I think Trump wins on the merits, but it will not change the “selection” (you have to put an s in front of election now) IF the case is argued.

I also think that Roberts is looking for anything he can find to NOT hear the case on the merits, but get rid of it on some technicality or some argument that “it is over now so whats the point”.

Either way it is going to be very contentious. The Chief Justice and other members of the court would do well to remind themselves that the election is a moment in time while the law is built and administered over very long time periods. The outright dismissal of such claims will forever change the authority of the court in our nation far beyond “Trump”.

It would cement the idea that our courts are now part of the body politic - a very dangerous idea that invalidates the role of the court in our constitution from which the court gathers all its authority.


56 posted on 02/14/2021 8:56:13 AM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

Just in the nick of time


57 posted on 02/14/2021 8:56:19 AM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McQ444; All

REVIEW THOSE GEORGIA SENATE ELECTION RESULTS

There were a series of fraudulent voting charges here. Were they enforced and corrected before this election took place ? If they weren’t is not a review called for ?
If the Georgia Secretary of State is in charge of voting he has the responsibility of enforcing the state’s regulations as to who votes. And eliminate those from voter lists who don’t qualify.

Assign prosecutors to personally canvass and investigate. Check if military actually voted by asking them. Identify all voters by checking on legal age their residency and citizenship. If found they do not qualify charge Illegals including state visitors known as snowbirds also include any technical computer fraudulent Italian programming testimony when presenting to the court and get these election results tossed.

LINKED HERE ARE REASONS WHY THIS IS WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3927647/posts#28

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3924076/posts#30
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3923435/posts#21
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3923157/posts#10
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3922715/posts#18
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3923312/posts#11


58 posted on 02/14/2021 9:00:31 AM PST by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin posting here for the record hoping somebody might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N
throw that imposter out of the WH on his keister.

The new Democrat party is a constitutional crisis.

59 posted on 02/14/2021 9:04:00 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

Hopefully this isn’t just a means of nwo trojan horse implant john roberts way of legitimizing mail in and online registrations and votes. I’m still not entirely certain we hold a majority in SCOTUS

Call me a seasoned skeptic


60 posted on 02/14/2021 9:04:06 AM PST by patriot torch (Ashlie Babbitt-say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson