Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: L.A.Justice

If this information is true, which I seriously doubt, it still has no bearing on the impeachment. The single article of impeachment is incitement. In their rush to vote on impeachment the House only voted on the single article. Since the “riot” was already underway when this call supposedly happened, then this call could not have been incitement. Again, if this is even true which is unlikely.


46 posted on 02/13/2021 8:33:59 AM PST by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: falcon99
If this information is true, which I seriously doubt, it still has no bearing on the impeachment. The single article of impeachment is incitement. In their rush to vote on impeachment the House only voted on the single article. Since the “riot” was already underway when this call supposedly happened, then this call could not have been incitement. Again, if this is even true which is unlikely.

Trump lawyer did ask the question about the relevance...Congressman Raskin argued it was relevant...He said that dereliction of duty is part of the incitement charge...Raskin is accusing that Mr. Trump refused to carry out his responsibility as the president on January 6th...I don't accept that argument but Democrats and a few Republicans did ...

Yes, indeed...There is only one article...

53 posted on 02/13/2021 9:05:42 AM PST by L.A.Justice ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson