[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

Of course, he just made an assumption, but didn't test audit the results elsewhere to determine if it was more widespread than just one place. He really doesn't want to know how widespread the fraud was.

If you read the followup articles I posted on the thread there were 17 districts that were hand recounted because of close races, and this particular type of error only happened in a single district. Note that these were not Dominion machines either, they were the old Diebold machines. Note also that democrats also missed votes too. So this does not match either conspiracy theory, the one were there was vote switching programmed into the machines nor the one in the Lindell video where Chinese hackers simply deleted votes.

[Dr. Franklin]

Note also that democrats also missed votes too.

They stole a few votes to give to the preferred Dem from other Dems, but took 6% of the vote from all Republicans, and you think that was just accidental? C'mon man! Witness statements here:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/windham-new-hampshire-election-witnesses-discuss-voting-machine-scandal-gateway-pundit-100-fed-video/

Note that these were not Dominion machines either, they were the old Diebold machines.

These are old Diebold machines to which Dominion acquired the intellectual property rights and handles software upgrades. It's the software that cheats, not the mechanical device.

[Dr. Franklin]

So this does not match either conspiracy theory, the one were there was vote switching programmed into the machines nor the one in the Lindell video where Chinese hackers simply deleted votes.

According to this, it is completely consistent with a conspiracy theory because the software was proven to be easily hackable, and there was no reason to be using such old machines and software:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/previous-study-accuvote-voting-machines-like-used-new-hampshire-found-serious-flaws-ability-steal-votes-little-risk-detection/