You're not digging - you've decided we're wrong and you're posting negatively to bring us to your point of view. "Good luck with that. That train has never left the station cause there was no train for it in the first place. It just isn't going to happen."
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3933691/posts?page=1071#1071
Why does a conspiracy\FF\body doubles\Inauguration\oval office\shenanigans get posed as gospel etc.
It doesn't. We disagree all the time.
but a contrarian view backed up with facts or proofs,
Your "contrarian view" is actually you taking pot shots (e.g, at Bigg Red) and waiting for us to accept your view that the entire premise of the thread is wrong. It's not going to happen because we're right, but you're going to work at wearing us down in the meantime.
In an earlier post, you said the company Granite was beyond reproach and wouldn't dare make claims about Anthony Weiner's laptop that were not legally true. When I countered that Granite is a company just like Twitter, Google, Facebook etc. and therefore equally capable of wrong doing - you countered by sneering I was in Fantasy Land. You didn't dig up info on Granite, you didn't offer logic or reasoning for your "contrarian view". Either I am to agree with you or be derided.
from someone who has been an active participant on these threads from almost the get-go,
That's the old "seniority" schtick we've seen from class of '98.
is not welcomed?
As I said, you're waiting for us to give up, and posting caustically without reason (e.g., Bigg Red) because you think we're benighted.
We're digging, waiting, and praying and you're posting "What will you do when it doesn't happen? How far into the Biden administration will you go before you give up the ghost?"
So the thread no longer meets you interests and you're here to "pull us back from the ledge." We don't need you to do that. You're the one out on the ledge - and you're posting to put us out there with you.
>>You know, Jim Rob asks people not to post on threads they disagree with just to poke the bear, stir it up.<<
you really need to look at my posts to see that is not true.
I've received comments via email about your caustic remarks (not just you, about others too, I get comments) for some time but never said anything to you privately because we are such different people and friction is a natural part of large groups (or small ones, or couples). But now you've basically come out and stated that you're here to counter us and wondering how long it will be before we "give up the ghost". That's trolling.
Pres. Trump is out. The election is over. “Q” has been silent for a long while.
This doesn’t seem like a “Q” thread any longer...so what is it?
It's not for you. It's for people who are holding the line, digging, red-pilling and (many are) praying.
We were flat out wrong and nobody wants to admit anything...we go into a different reality...how does that work?
"We" were not flat out wrong. "We" have nothing to admit. "We" are not in a different reality. You're saying we're wrong, we won't admit it, and we're in a different reality. By coinicidence, trolls in the forum have been saying the same thing for years.
Trolls who visit our thread to harass us for being on FR also tell us they are just voicing a "contrarian view". Jim Rob said if you don't agree with the content of the thread - stay off it and don't post to poke the bear. He doesn't have any qualifiers saying, "but if you're doing it for their own good" or "unless you've been on the thread a long time". He just says don't do it.
Seems like it puts us a few steps closer to the smokey backroom
"Us?" You are not with us. You think we're flat out wrong and are staying here to keep chipping away at "Us". Please leave.
>>I’ve received comments via email about your caustic remarks (not just you, about others too, I get comments) for some time but never said anything to you privately.>>
you know darn well I am approachable. You could have called me out in the forum or in PM re: caustic remarks.
Go ahead and show me. Bring the whole discussion.
I remember that weiner laptop discussion. It started with me responding to you retelling the tweet rumor that 12 LEOs saw Weiner’s laptop and 9 are dead. That has never even come close to be proven... and that got us into our discussion about the evidence I was able to secure vs. your conspiracy surrounding it.
Don’t put words in my mouth. I don’t remember saying Granite is beyond reproach. You deduced I had 100% confidence in Granite... which I never said, then I ran with your 100% number. I also recall posing things as questions about why Granite would do something illegal.
Don’t lump me with the people who trolled our threads. I stayed the course.
maybe it is time to take a break...
🤣🤣🤣🤣I like smokey back rooms. Ha.