Posted on 02/10/2021 9:15:38 AM PST by Hostage
Here is Mike Lindell’s ABSOLUTE PROOF film in eight segments suitable for shorter time viewing and also for emailing links:
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage
2021-02-05-1 ABSOLUTE PROOF Mike Lindell Introduction - 12:43
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/JU7CnAE
2021-02-05-2 ABSOLUTE PROOF Col Phil Waldron - 10:45
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/ndI9SwQ
2021-02-05-3 ABSOLUTE PROOF Russell Ramsland - 25:08
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/pOHDRSd
2021-02-05-4 ABSOLUTE PROOF Dr Shiva - 13:07
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/ov5DzdU
2021-02-05-5 ABSOLUTE PROOF MI Sen Colbeck & Mellissa Carone - 6:19
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/XrCCq6G
2021-02-05-6 ABSOLUTE PROOF Matthew DePerno - 27:48
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/BHqvXyF
2021-02-05-7 ABSOLUTE 100 PERCENT PROOF Mary Fanning - 13:38
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/DtXDJ4U
2021-02-05-8 ABSOLUTE PROOF Gen McInerney & FBI Terry Turchie - 9:45
https://newtube.app/user/Hostage/MjtfPCG
Please feel free to circulate and please do so immediately, let it spread like wildfire.
bkmk
This is the very first time I’ve ever heard of “newtube”. I need to do some research on it.
bkmrk
RE: 2021-02-05-7 ABSOLUTE 100 PERCENT PROOF Mary Fanning - 13:38
Here’s a suggestion as to how to make this video more convincing.
This portion of the video from Mary Fanning should have been dynamite. We see glimpses of a spreadsheet that, we are told, are foreign intrusions into 2995 counties before, during and after November 3, 2020. I tend to believe it. The data we can see does show China as the big culprit.
But we only see a fraction of the take and at no time are we informed how this information in Mary Fanning’s hands was collected and stored. I had hoped that Mary would have taken some steps to explain how she and her groups got their hands on this potentially bombshell data.
Also, we need a background as to the technical expertise of Mary Fanning and her group. Who are they and what are their experiences in this area?
Just a constructive suggestion from moi.
Will any Judge, anywhere in this country, allow for any of this Absolute Proof to be presented? Unfortunately, I don’t think so. The corruption and the complicity are that widespread in Biden’s America. The only one’s suffering any negative consequences would be the conservative Truth Tellers. This bizarre new reality continues, unabated.
I was searching for the video of Ruby Freeman counting the same ballots 3 times and it seems the Tech oligarchs have memory holed it.
Luckily, I saved it when it was online:
https://rumble.com/vdq9o1-fulton-county-counts-same-ballots-3-times.html
I think the full background on Fanning’s presentation is to be presented to the US Supreme Court. The good news is SCOTUS holds a scheduling conference Friday, February 19. But it may be heard say as early as March or as late as October for the case to be heard. .
or the whole thing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NXVTVcTXCIFTTVecY4_TCI24GFBlrgCW/view?usp=sharing
Can someone link me to Mike’s full documentary or tell me where to find it? Thank you
Stephen K. Bannon and Mike Lindell are teaming up to walk through the entirety of Absolute Proof and will explain every detail, Thursday night at 8.pm. on One America News Network. “We’re going to break it apart, ask the toughest questions,” Bannon said. “No one is here to tell you what to think.”
There’s also that “Time Magazine” article in which US oligarchs admitted they stole (”saved”) the 2020 election!!!!
https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
There is NO DOUBT that the 2020 election was stolen from President Trump, and from the American people!!!! I hope that the Supreme Court—and others with any power—are paying attention!! AndI also hope that there is something effective that they can do about it. (I unfortunately don’t know of anything.)
Full film linked in #9 above your post. Thanks to kvanbrunt2.
Mike Lindell has a website with it, or had it, I haven’t checked it recently. But at the rate the Marxists are shutting him down, his website could be deplatformed or taken down. This is why file download is important.
Sorry, They are in on it. The end.
If you haven’t already seen the following thread, it provides a glimmer of hope where patriot judges are concerned.
Trump Won Two-Thirds of Election Lawsuits Where Merits Considered
Also, the Supreme Court wrongly denied Texas and the Trump Campaign due process when the Court decided not to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania in December imo.
More specifically, not only did the Supremes not invent the constitutionally undefined "no standing" excuse not to hear cases until Massachusetts v. Mellon, 1923, but Justice Joseph Story had previously clarified the Constitution’s state v. state clause.
"Article III, Section 2, Clause 1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States [emphasis added];—between a State and Citizens of another State; (See Note 10)-- between Citizens of different States, --between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."
Based on the experience of the colonies, Story had written that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had made the state versus state clause to obligate (my word) the Supremes to consider evidence between conflicted states as a last effort try to avoid the worst possible outcome of such a conflict.
From the writings of Justice Joseph Story…
§ 1674. "Under the confederation, authority was given to the national government, to hear and determine, (in the manner pointed out in the article,) in the last resort, on appeal, all disputes and differences between two or more states concerning boundary, jurisdiction, or any other cause whatsoever [!!! emphases added]. Before the adoption of this instrument, as well as afterwards, very irritating and vexatious controveries existed between several of the states, in respect to soil, jurisdiction, and boundary; and threatened the most serious public mischiefs. Some of these controversies were heard and determined by the court of commissioners, appointed by congress. But, notwithstanding these adjudications, the conflict was maintained in some cases, until after the establishment of the present constitution." —Justice Joseph Story, Article 3, Section 2, Clause 1, Commentaries on the Constitution 3, 1833, The University of Chicago Press.
§ 1675. "Before the revolution, controversies between the colonies, concerning the extent of their rights of soil, territory, jurisdiction, and boundary, under their respective charters, were heard and determined before the king in council, who exercised original jurisdiction therein, upon the principles of feudal sovereignty. This jurisdiction was often practically asserted, as in the case of the dispute between Massachusetts and New Hampshire, decided by the privy council, in 1679; and in the case of the dispute between New Hampshire and New York, in 1764. Lord Hardwicke recognised this appellate jurisdiction in the most deliberate manner, in the great case of Penn v. Lord Baltimore. The same necessity, which gave rise to it in our colonial state, must continue to operate through all future time. Some tribunal, exercising such authority, is essential to prevent an appeal to the sword, and a dissolution of the government [emphasis added]. That it ought to be established under the national, rather than under the state, government; or, to speak more properly, that it can be safely established under the former only, would seem to be a position self-evident, and requiring no reasoning to support it. It may justly be presumed, that under the national government in all controversies of this sort, the decision will be impartially made according to the principles of justice; and all the usual and most effectual precautions are taken to secure this impartiality, by confiding it to the highest judicial tribunal." —Justice Joseph Story, Article 3, Section 2, Clause 1, Commentaries on the Constitution 3,1833, The University of Chicago Press.
For emphasis, from paragraph 1675 above…
"The same necessity, which gave rise to it in our colonial state, must continue to operate through all future time." —Justice Joseph Story, Article 3, Section 2, Clause 1, Commentaries on the Constitution 3,1833, The University of Chicago Press.
Also, consider that the Civil War Union States ignored any electoral votes of the Confederate States for the presidential election of 1864.
"Because eleven Southern states had declared secession from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America, only twenty-five states participated in the election." —Presidential election of 1864.
Finally, as another freeper has suggested, consider that Trump as private citizen actually has more flexibility to deal with many of the nation's problems, including election fraud by desperate Democrats, than if he had remained in Oval Office.
In other words, if he needs the Oval Office he may just go back there.
Corrections, insights welcome.
That's because it's fake.
Fact Check: 'Raw Data Analytics' Posted By The American Report Does NOT Prove China, Russia Hacked 2020 Election
Also, we need a background as to the technical expertise of Mary Fanning and her group.
Mary Fanning appears to be a professional conspiracy theorist writing conspiracy articles.
In a similar vein to Mike Lindell’s video,
this one does a good job as well:
https://www.infowars.com/posts/new-video-points-out-how-votes-were-split-by-algorithms-in-2020-election/
Easy to understand with a nice summary at the end.
www.michaeljlindell.com
www.michaeljlindell.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.