Posted on 02/07/2021 1:32:14 AM PST by RandFan
DR. WAKEFIELD WARNS : ”THIS IS NOT A VAX, IT IS IRREVERSIBLE GENETIC MODIFICATION”
Video..
(Excerpt) Read more at bitchute.com ...
I believe we are still waiting to hear your clinical credentials. It’s ok. We know toj don’t have any
I find it interesting you smear me as an atheist. Which could not be further from the truth. Why do you do this? No cogent argument?
Is that the royal “we”? You replied to my #93. What specifically do you disagree with, OH CREDENTIALED ONE?
The vaccine does NOT change your DNA and it’s not gene therapy or any touch nonsense. The vaccine contains mRNA. This is a molecule that already is in each and every cell of your body. Your DNA encodes the sequence of amino acids that are needed to produce the essential proteins your body requires. The DNA is isolated from the cellular mechanisms called ribosomes that actually produce the proteins. Therefore a mechanism that acts as a messenger is needed - that’s mRNA (the m actually stands for messenger). When a protein is synthesized your body makes an mRNA strand that corresponds to your DNA. Your DNA remains safely isolated to be reused over and over. The mRNA goes to the ribosome and is used as the template for building the protein.
The vaccine does NOT change your DNA instructions. Essentially the vaccine provides a new messenger to the ribosomes. The ribosomes use the vaccine template to produce the viral spike protein that generates the immune response.
In less technical terms, your body makes proteins from a blueprint (DNA). The blueprint remains locked up in a safe (the cell nucleus) so it isn’t damaged. When the factory (ribosomes) gets an order to produce protein, it asks for a photocopy (mRNA) of the blueprint so it knows how to proceed. The photocopies are destroyed after production (your cells’ enzymes that break the mRNA down), but the original remains. The vaccine simply gives a different photocopy to the ribosome to work from, resulting in a viral protein being made.
Ironically, those afraid of having something modify their genetic code should be FIRST in line to get the vaccine. Regardless of how lethal the virus is, a viral infection does in fact modify your DNA. That’s how viruses work. Viruses are really nothing but a piece of genetic material wrapped in a protein coat. They can’t do anything living cells do, specifically they can’t reproduce without the help of a cell. They use their protein coat to enter a cell, get into the nucleus, and incorporate their genetic material into the host cell’s genome. Once that occurs, the cell no longer functions normally, but instead turns into a “virus factory”, producing multiple new viruses. Eventually the infected cell ruptures and dies, spreading all the new viruses to other cells.
It’s the viral infection, not the vaccine, that actually changes your genetic code.
See my post, here...about possible natural immunity.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3932102/posts?page=60#60
It’s an actual, first hand example, that I know of.
This information ought to shut her up, but I have a feeling that she is one of those stubborn types and will keep advocating against usage of Ivermectin and HCQ to treat Wuhan coronavirus infections.
We’re not getting it either. For similar reasons as you state.
Trump’s job as the president is to do the right thing, not to do the damaging but least politically costly thing.
Please use name Wuhan virus rather than China virus.
We need to make accommodation for future viruses that will come from other parts of China 😂
There are no therapeutics that prevent or cure. The best is monoclonal antibodies. Bamlanivimab or Regeneron. You continue to promote verifiably incorrect information.
You posted before reading further. I now get that and more.
Follow up questions.
Is it only the spike protein being produced by the mRNA or are there any others produced and does it match the virus protein 100%?
Is the shot 100% spike protein mRNA, carrying medium and preservatives?
If the spike protein is the infective mechanism via the ace2 receptor and mutation of the virus rna expression of the protein would render it non-infectious, why are the vaccines not 100% effective against the old and new mutated forms of the virus? Does it have other infective mechanisms?
Do the antibodies produced have any activity against normal human tissue? I have seen a small study of recovered Italian men having much lower motile/viable sperm counts post infection and given the stated world population intentions of the people pushing the vaccines so hard it raises my eyebrows.
I did NOT write or quote or imply the italicized sentence that begins the Comment you sent to me.
I have no idea what point you are trying to make.
There are not studies. What I do know is that for every other virus once you get it you are immune. This is a member is the Corona virus family. Other Corona virus infections get to T cell immunity. I do not believe this is different than any other virus.
The advice of J&J is based on a gut felling of you will. Those who haven’t had it should proceed with Pfizer or Modena as it has been shown 95% effective and able to get to T cell immunity after second injection.
Knowing that there are monoclonal antibodies and if I had the disease I would probably not be vaccinated. This is an opinion only. But it comes from my training in medical school snd my judgment that this virus is not setting 100 years of immunology theory on its head.
It was from the poster you were replying to so I thought you would know that I was adding additional (in agreement) commentary to your reply. Sorry for the confusion.
No. Mom Md asked you as well. I await with curiosity.
That sentence was in her comment, but I stopped reading after she began her "credential challenge," and I did not see it.
I apologize.
Good to know.
Would the people who have had the monoclonal infusion also have the T Cell immunity? They have to fight it off on top of the added antibodies? Is this right? This has been checked hasn’t it?
If these things were the magic bullets some think no one would be in the icu.
I'm waiting for her respsonse to that statement in all it gloriously flawed logic and flawed analytical deduction.
Your post 93 takes something out of context and then you espouse your incorrect and nonclinical knowledge repeating talking points. When called on it by another physician you fail to demonstrate any knowledge or credential to validate your opinion.
So you can play rhetorical games forever but you just plain wrong.
They haven’t provided any ‘facts’, just their scaremongering propaganda.
*****************************************
There is a ton of facts and evidence. Although, I’m not going to waste my time trying to convince you. Especially, since you never had any intellectual curiosity to read anything other than statements from the government, or studies paid by the government .
Plus, I really don’t care if you choose to believe everything the government puts out about vaccine safety. It doesn’t affect my life whatsoever. Except, when you start calling for the prosecution of non believers.
That is a very dangerous and totalitarian road to go down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.