Posted on 02/05/2021 3:24:36 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
MyPillow magnate Mike Lindell has barely slept as he worked on an opus meant to prove the election was stolen. But Lindell’s claims—and his movie—don’t hold up.
I heard it was pretty good stuff.
Bkmk
If you do not have the time to spend watching the Lindell video, I suggest you view the first 13 minutes and then move to the 1 hour and 36 minute mark and watch the presentation by Mary Fanning who provides specific evidence that shows every single web attack from its source, mostly in China, to it specific target location in the US.
It is very thorough and believable.
Why else would Big Tech be trying to cancel Mike?
He is taking all that flak because he is right over the target.
Not a very stable or truthful guy.
Yes. Her segment was very interesting.
It would be proof to any reasonable person.
Unfortunately, most of our courts and judges are not reasonable or honest.
I missed the Washington Times article; what did it say? :)
I agree. It is rare to find a person like Mike who stands by his convictions.
I agree. The show was riveting, but sadly, also disappointing. Disappointing because it just solidified the message that our Government is corrupt to the core. The DOJ/FBI were shown this evidence, and they ignored it.
They ignored the fact that our Nation was attacked by foreign forces (and internal enemies as well). Basically our esteemed judicial forces are working in collusion with foreign entities against America.
And the gutless legislatures refused to see the evidence.
Great presentation - but what is next? At this point, it seems like we can just repeat the words of Jehoshaphat:
2 Chronicles 20:12 O our God, wilt thou not judge them? for we have no might against this great company that cometh against us; neither know we what to do: but our eyes are upon thee.
Mike’s documentary has people with unassailable credentials., fare more credible than any of the communist talking heads on the left.
............................................
Absolutely true but unfortunately the credibility of those people is not what influences the masses who are continuously indoctrinated by the ideologues of Socialism who dominate the news media and academia throughout the country.
Mike’s documentary has people with unassailable credentials., fare more credible than any of the communist talking heads on the left.
............................................
Absolutely true but unfortunately the credibility of those people is not what influences the masses who are being continuously indoctrinated by the ideologues of Socialism who dominate the news media and academia throughout the country.
jump to 1 hour 35 more or less
It’s 3 hours long because Lindell talks too much during the presentation.
.....................................
Yes, and I composed a note on another thread that I’m hoping gets picked up and passed on to him about that. I urged him to (1) immediately edit out of the video every instance of him exclaiming “WOW” over every compelling comment of his guests; and (2) immediately edit out every instance where he interrupts and/or talks over his witnesses. Both of these unprofessional weaknesses greatly detract from his otherwise brilliant video exposing the enormity of the fraud.
Yeah, just for fun I decided to see if I could find a good list of things we were not allowed to do in high school debate class. This is as close as I could come:
1. False dichotomy - this is where the speaker is trying to falsely divide the debate into two sides even though there are more alternatives than they state. It’s likely the speaker is doing this on purpose but in some cases they do not understand the debate.
2. Assertion - this is when a speaker presents a statement which isn’t actually an argument because there is no reason to believe that the statement is valid. It may just be an assumption. You can point out that there has not been enough examination to prove this validity and then give a reason why the assertion is (probably) not valid.
3. Morally flawed - arguments can be morally flawed, for example, “All criminals given a prison sentence should be given the death penalty instead, this will save the country money and space.” What has been argued is true but it’s clearly morally flawed.
4. Correlation rather than causation - a speaker may suggest a link between two events and suggest one led to the other. But the speaker may not explain how one caused the other event which can make an argument invalid.
5. Failure to deliver promises - sometimes a speaker might fail to complete a task they promised to deliver. For instance, they may state that they will provide evidence supporting a certain claim but they may lose track of what they have said and not actually do this.
6. Straw man - the opposing team introduces an argument and then rebuts it. They may use an extreme example of your proposal or perhaps they were hoping that you would make this argument.
7. Contradiction - an argument the other team presents may contradict one of their previous arguments. You must point out that the arguments cannot be true simultaneously and then explain how this reduces their case’s credibility.
8. Compare the conclusion to reality - think “what would happen if what they (the other team) are suggesting is implemented right now?” This usually shows that it’s more complicated than they have suggested and the changes can cause secondary problems.
This is from: https://virtualspeech.com/blog/guide-to-debating
Not as good as Mr. Heald’s list of 20 things from high school but it covers about 90% of the main points of the left I think.
She said they have these logs real time for 2,950 counties in the USA.
...............................................
Interesting, because at the time of the 2016 election I believe there were 3,112 counties and Trump won somewhere around 2,600 of them. I have that info written down, but not handy at the moment.
I think it proves what we’ve known all along.
IIRC, they said Trump got about 79 million votes and Biden got 63 million votes.
Seriously? It is NOT THREE HOURS LONG (unless you took breaks? or slow motion). It runs 2 hours.
Ever hear of playback speed? If you cannot handle 2 hours, you can always bump up the playback speed and take less time. I bumped up to 1.25 and watched it in 1.5 hours.
Hopefully most here are very familiar with much of the election fraud issue. However, I suspect he wants this video to reach people who are not all that familiar with the issue—Why does he interject “Wow!” Well perhaps it is because:
1. He wants to draw emphasis to certain facts for the uninformed.
2. He wants people to be able to have a mental break...To the uninformed, this may be entirely new information— and it is like taking in a drink of water thru a fire hose...
He paid for it, so he can do with it as he wants; I am glad he did this, and I liked the entire presentation.
Have a good evening.
Mike must be pretty confident because Dominion is suing everyone for billions for just insinuating they rigged the election. Mike not only says it, he proves it. Of course Dominion may file suit tomorrow because that’s their cry of innocence, their bogus lawsuits.
The Russians knew we were monitoring the traffic flow...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.