Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: logi_cal869

If they start destroying surface ships than the submarine launched strategic weapons start becoming more of a realistic option.


15 posted on 01/31/2021 10:38:08 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie

Difficult to detect by radar, small to nonexistent thermal signature, hard to detect acoustic signature at loiter ranges (I do not believe the US military has ever deployed aerial acoustic sensors for the purpose of detecting aircraft, but I could be wrong), zero radio frequency emission coupled with low-energy EMF emissions, homes upon the target’s own radio/radar frequencies, reasonable one-way range, ability to loiter undetected like a mine, low-altitude controlled flight, rapid acceleration in conjunction with terminal attack...
INEXPENSIVE...
SMALL (i.e. limited space for stores)...
SWARMABLE...

Think about it. Coupled with UUVs, deployment of such weapons portends a disaster for our fleet or, as intended, denies our fleet a surface response.

I do not believe that I will be alive to see it, but the next major conflict will be as revolutionary as the end of the battlewagon era.

Then again, things are changing so fast...you never know.


19 posted on 01/31/2021 11:08:37 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson