It’s an oddity but it has nothing to do with the validity of being sworn in.
~~~~~~~~~~~
If the MSM lies about a 21 gun salute it has nothing to do with the validity of other broadcast information that day?
Lack of 21 gun salute means lack of military support. The military would support a duly elected president.
There was an early report that the Pentagon refused to share information and continued to consult what appeared to be an attorney present. Note that situation was at a stand still in the article.
Biden didn’t ask the troops to flood the capitol ahead of his arrival - President Trump was visibly in office then. Trump never said he conceded, because he didn’t and he wouldn’t to China’s puppet.
You can have a swearing in ceremony for a ham sandwich but it doesn’t make it president.
Lack of 21-gun salute, lack of military plane upon arrival, while one was given Trump upon exit (even from Andrews to Florida) indicates no civilian Commander In Chief, otherwise the military is refusing to take instruction from a lawful president.
Washington Post Op-ed: Trump ‘Must Never Have’ a Presidential Library
Breitbart ^ | January 29, 2021 | JOEL B. POLLAK
Posted on 1/30/2021, 4:16:33 PM by lowbridge
I’m talking about the Constitution.
A 21 gun salute or not is irrelevant and faking one is irrelevant. Faking the entire ceremony is irrelevant.
Biden is damaging our national security right now, stopping Wall construction, putting China’s fingers back in our power grid, killing the KL pipeline which damages our energy independence, reopening Obamacare and a LOT more.
The military would never let a fake President do this kind of damage!