Posted on 01/29/2021 1:41:02 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski
Background
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) emerged in China in 2002 and spread to other countries before brought under control. Because of a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated. Evaluations of an inactivated whole virus vaccine in ferrets and nonhuman primates and a virus-like-particle vaccine in mice induced protection against infection but challenged animals exhibited an immunopathologic-type lung disease.
Design
Four candidate vaccines for humans with or without alum adjuvant were evaluated in a mouse model of SARS, a VLP vaccine, the vaccine given to ferrets and NHP, another whole virus vaccine and an rDNA-produced S protein. Balb/c or C57BL/6 mice were vaccinated IM on day 0 and 28 and sacrificed for serum antibody measurements or challenged with live virus on day 56. On day 58, challenged mice were sacrificed and lungs obtained for virus and histopathology.
Results
All vaccines induced serum neutralizing antibody with increasing dosages and/or alum significantly increasing responses. Significant reductions of SARS-CoV two days after challenge was seen for all vaccines and prior live SARS-CoV. All mice exhibited histopathologic changes in lungs two days after challenge including all animals vaccinated (Balb/C and C57BL/6) or given live virus, influenza vaccine, or PBS suggesting infection occurred in all. Histopathology seen in animals given one of the SARS-CoV vaccines was uniformly a Th2-type immunopathology with prominent eosinophil infiltration, confirmed with special eosinophil stains. The pathologic changes seen in all control groups lacked the eosinophil prominence.
Conclusions
These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.
(Excerpt) Read more at journals.plos.org ...
1. Protection against the original virus
2. Hypersensitivity to all future Coronaviruses
3. Death of the animal test subjects
MODERATOR: the date should be changed to 2012
Some of the deaths in Wuhan were people who the trial Vaccine before the current outbreak. There was some leak stories about this last March.
So much of this needs to be exposed for fraud. The virus is real, but has been highly exagerated and used for nefarious gain
Great video
Soory Jan. I was implying how the covid virus was being used.
Test run?
Sure. I agree! From this research paper, I am much more concerned about the Vaccine than the Virus! (no vaccine for my family)
Yep. Here’s another researcher saying, in essence, the current covid vaccine is setting up the recipients to die when they are “challenged” by the real virus. It should protect you in your younger years, but causes the body to attack itself like arthritis. When you develop another co-morbidity in your advanced years, you will die from it.
Yes.
I’ve pointed these studies out here since the beginning of the Wuhan flu.
I’m not sure there is evidence this delayed response is occurring due to the current vaccines, but it is something to monitor.
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread. I’m giving the vaccine a year of public distribution before joining the experiment. Using Vitamin D 1000u and Zinc with Quercetin will continue to work fine for me in the meantime.
Now that even the AMA has found HCQ+Zinc+AZ to be beneficial for symptomatic patients there’s no rush.
Might want to wait 2-3 years just to be safe
I recall a couple of articles from 9 or ten months ago theorizing why the COVI19 death rate was so high in Italy. It was speculated that many in Italy had taken the SARS vaccine in the early 2000s; which had negative long-term effects on the immune system.
Now they say something?
Will have to wait until spring to see what happens to all the vaxxed subjects when they get exposed again.
This link is to a new interview of Dr Judy Merkovitz. I watched it earlier today. I WILL NEVER ACCEPT THIS “VACCINE”.
Also on jameslyonsweiler.com from December 6, 2020 “Susceptibility of People to Pathogenic Priming is a Prime Reason to Eschew Covid 19 Vaccine Mandates”. Yet another source of the same thing.
Ezekiel Jonathan “Zeke” Emanuel is Biden’s medical policy adviser. He has repeatedly said that anyone over 65 should be denied medical care. It looks as if many people vaccinated for Covid will be primed to die decades before their time, but after age 65. Convenient, eh?
it’s a different vaccine. mRNA is new, this trial was a VLP or Virus-Like Protein with or without aluminum adjuvant. Totally different animal.
I’m holding off on any vaccine right now. I’m just getting over SARS/pneumonia; I didn’t have an antibody response to the virus. tested positive twice two weeks apart.
How will a vaccine work then?
Gen.Blather wrote: “Yep. Here’s another researcher saying, in essence, the current covid vaccine is setting up the recipients to die when they are “challenged” by the real virus. It should protect you in your younger years, but causes the body to attack itself like arthritis. When you develop another co-morbidity in your advanced years, you will die from it.”
The professor in the video stated: “Normally, because the mRNA is in every cell of their body, it’s almost unstoppable. It destroys the heart, or the spleen, or the lungs, or the liver because the mRNA is expressing the protein in every cell.”
So what? The mRNA causes the body to produce antibodies to the virus just like one would produce antibodies after an infection. IOW, anyone who has had CV19 would face these same issues. BTW, the mRNA does not remain in the body nor does it modify a persons DNA. So what’s the point other than more fear pornograph?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.