Posted on 01/22/2021 7:46:13 AM PST by albie
Harris is neither black nor legally eligible to hold the office of VP from what I understand. What is she then and what is her ineligible background?
When she was born in the U.S., neither of her parents were citizens. Both were holders of green cards only. Thus she is not a Natural Born Citizen.
There is a difference between being a citizen and a natural born citizen. What you refer to is the first. The second is a qualification to be president of the US and that requires that a person be born of US Citizens parents, both mother and father and some say be born on US soil though I am not positive on the US soil part. What #7 said is exactly right. Thus Kamala is not Constitutionally qualified to be President because she is not a natural born citizen of the US and since she is not qualifid to be President, is not qualified to be VP
In answer to your question...no I do not think it right for illegals to be there n this country...period. I do however believe that any children they have here are citizens according to our laws. Now if you want that changed then petition Congress to change that.
The kids did not have any say as where they were born and I do not think the children should pay for the wrongdoing their parents committed.
” I do not think the children should pay for the wrongdoing their parents committed”
Nobody makes them pay anything. They inherit their parent’s nationality. Is that a penalty?
I’m not gonna waste time on a birthright citizenship thread, it’s been done here so many times it’s agonizing. So you go do your own research. Start with John Eastman, the guy who just got fired from Chapman University for doing a speech next to Don Trump. He explains it all.
As for Congress, you are correct: the bill to clarify the 14th Amendment has been introduced and tabled probably 5 times. But Trump was going to do it by EO, and if the State Dept can do it, so could he. But he didn’t, and it’s a giant problem because Biden is going to abolish the very idea of being American, which is what the Globalist trash want.
Actually I have read the verbiage in Article 2,section 1 about the citizen qualification just says citizen...period. Are in 1898 the Supreme Court ruled tha a child born to non citizens was a citizen. Pretty clear to me.
So you can twist this anyway you want but I stand by my contention that the children born here regardless of their parents citizenship are indeed citizens of the United States. So by your line of reasoning I should hold English nationality, which implies a passport, citizship, because my ancestors cam from England?? So I am an illegal citizen unable to run for President??
Well if I am illegal then I want my free stuff...😀
Like I said, not gonna do it. Told you what to read. Wong Kim Ark is just one element. As for being a Natural Born Citizen, that’s even more of a debate.
We are so far away from such a thing really making any difference. I suppose there are some who really think that this could be, or ought to be, used as a pretext to delegitimize her. This would be a pointless distraction. I also wonder if you, rkt, still feel some constitutional idealism, but of all that we have lost from that beautiful but now obviously obsolete document, why is this the thing to mention?
While we were reacting to Mueller and impeachment, the enemy built an excellent vote steal system and used it to take the House 2 years ago. Then while we took pleasure in the Tweets of the POTUS, and in imagining hundreds of miles of wall, they again used that system to kick him out and also take the Senate.
What is to be done? How would this question be a part of that? How would it matter whether Kamala was “eligible”, or Obama either?
Kind regards, Patriot. We win in the end.
What is Kamala Harris? Proof that women really can sleep their way to the top.
Citizens, yes, by our own laws. Natural born citizens, no.
Kamala will be President in about 3 months. Hillary Clinton will be appointed Vice President shortly thereafter. Then the Natural Born Citizen clause will be debated vis a vis Kamala Harris’ eligibility to be President. I expect that if Democrats need it defined strictly that is how it will be interpreted and enforced. Rules are made to be used.
The Senate and Homeland Security agreed in the original SR-511 bill that to be eligible for POTUS one had to be born on US soil of two US citizen parents. Even lying ineligible obamy signed that not once but twice.
I have popcorn ready for when they decided Uncle Creepy is too loco to continue. There will be a cat fight between ineligible Harris and 3rd in line Pelosi.
In the Kenyan Parliament Minutes, they state obamy was indeed born there.
They’ll have to admit obamy was ineligible.
IF 2 dogs are AKC registered, then their pups can be registered...
Otherwise, those pups are MUTTS.
Kamala is a MUTT..
So IS OBAMA.
You are thinking about the wrong STAFF....
That is EXACTLY what she is & NOTHING MORE...
Citizen & Natural Born Citizen==2 different things.
“Kamala Harris was born in Oakland, California, on October 20, 1964.” She was born on US soil.
Under the 14th Amendment’s Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship. This type of citizenship is referred to as birthright citizenship.
The main difference between her and Barrack is that his family witnessed his birth in Queen’s Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya and admitted it. That birth was forged because his mom, the US citizen part of the parenting, had lived outside the US for more years than was allowed to make him a US citizen even though he has dual citizenship with England who had control of Kenya at that time. Those records remain sealed. His birth was phoned in.
wy69
“Kamala Harris was born in Oakland, California, on October 20, 1964.” She was born on US soil.
Under the 14th Amendment’s Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship. This type of citizenship is referred to as birthright citizenship.
The main difference between her and Barrack is that his family witnessed his birth in Queen’s Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya and admitted it. That birth was forged because his mom, the US citizen part of the parenting, had lived outside the US for more years than was allowed to make him a US citizen even though he has dual citizenship with England who had control of Kenya at that time. Those records remain sealed. His birth was phoned in.
wy69
Well. She can’t really be compromised any more can she? Blackmailed? So she’s got that going for her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.