Why are the Bidens IMMUNE from the EO for masks
which Beijing ordered for everyone else??????
Posted on 01/21/2021 2:34:05 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski
ABSTRACT
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on August 23, 2020, “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19 , on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.”[1] For a nation tormented by restrictive public health policies mandated for healthy individuals and small businesses, this is the most important statistical revelation of this crisis.
This revelation significantly impacts the published fatalities count due to COVID-19. More importantly, it exposes major problems with the process by which the CDC was able to generate inaccurate data during a crisis. The CDC has advocated for social isolation, social distancing, and personal protective equipment use as primary mitigation strategies in response to the COVID-19 crisis, while simultaneously refusing to acknowledge the promise of inexpensive pharmaceutical and natural treatments. These mitigation strategies were promoted largely in response to projection model fatality forecasts that have proven to be substantially inaccurate.
Further investigation into the legality of the methods used to create these strategies raised additional concerns and questions. Why would the CDC decide against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review? Did the CDC’s decision to abandon a known and proven effective system also breach several federal laws that ensure data accuracy and integrity? Did the CDC knowingly alter rules for reporting cause of death in the presence of comorbidity exclusively for COVID-19?
(Excerpt) Read more at cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com ...
"Had the CDC used the 2003 guidelines, the total COVID-19 [would] be approximately 16.7 times lower than is currently being reported." -- it sure puts the "Trump killed 200,000 Americans" into perspective...
Maybe I'm just too cynical, but it never was about the "science". It was about WAGs (wild ass guesses) and politics.
Why are the Bidens IMMUNE from the EO for masks
which Beijing ordered for everyone else??????
bookmark
The lack of comments on this post is representative of either bad timing, or true ignorance here at FR.
I missed this last year and it truly puts in perspective the reality about the inflated 400k figure “due to coronavirus”...
One year ago today:
After the Chinese city of Wuhan halted outbound flights, trains, buses and ferries in an effort to stop the spread of a deadly new virus, 12 other cities in the province followed suit, bringing more than 36 million people under lockdown.
After the Chinese city of Wuhan halted outbound flights, trains, buses and ferries in an effort to stop the spread of a deadly new virus, 12 other cities in the province followed suit, bringing more than 36 million people under lockdown. Health officials in Chicago said a woman in her 60s had become the second U.S. patient diagnosed with the new virus; she’d returned from China in mid-January.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/today-history-75453369
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.