No matter how we disagree => You are absolutely 100% correct for calling me out on that <=, and I apologize for that mistake.
"The dog ate my homework"
This point is separate from Q, a shift of subject for a moment. This has nothing to do with with agreeing or disagreeing over Q.
In how social movement works, movements have to bring in new members and bring them up to speed. When potential members or those with questions are greeted with hostility, misrepresentation, and told they don't get it, get lost, it drives people away.
Like I said, all the Q specific primer links on this site are now dead links. The early history of Q and discussion, is disappearing and slowly getting so buried in search engines.
If Q is real, it is the responsibility for those who believe in Q to be able to explain Q to bring new members on board. Telling people to do their homework by looking up dead links, or tracking through 4chan, to 8chan, to now 8kun (while it lasts) is not going to help the Q movement.
Right now, new people trying to look at Q are not going any substantial background, will not understand any of it, and find a lot of Q supporters are hostile to explaining it. That will make Q die off.
Now, does that sound reasonable to you? I am obviously not a Q supporter. But from what I have posted here, are these matters Q supporters should be concerned, if Q is real, and they want Q to last?
You’re talking like a communist.
As we learned early on, Q is a group of about 10 people, of whom only about 3 or so are non-military. They all have the highest security clearance, which is “Q” level. Hence, Q. There are other links to Q drops, not just the one mentioned above. If you really wanted to know about it, you would do your own research. There are over 300 Q threads, all numbered. You could start at the beginning - you don’t even have to go to the links! Like I said, you are just making excuses for your ignorance. We will quit treating you like a troll when you quit acting like one!
For those of us who have been following along since the beginning, Q has built credibility over thousands of drops since the beginning of 2018. It is not like accepting a religion. There is no "Faith" involved. For me it started like a game of riddles and "Proofs" of Q's authenticity. Eventually, we came to "Trust the plan". It was never a matter of Q telling us what to do. He/She/They posed riddles, asked questions and told us to do our own research and "Think for yourself".
We are followers of Q not in the sense that we take direction from Q but rather in the sense that we are paying attention to it, following clues and looking for answers to the questions raised.
About that "Trust the Plan" thing. "No battle plan survives first contact intact". The enemy will not follow your plan. He will fight back. And when your plan turns to crap, you have to make a new plan.
I think that is where we are now.
In how social movement works, movements have to bring in new members and bring them up to speed. When potential members or those with questions are greeted with hostility, misrepresentation, and told they don’t get it, get lost, it drives people away.
Like I said, all the Q specific primer links on this site are now dead links. The early history of Q and discussion, is disappearing and slowly getting so buried in search engines.
If Q is real, it is the responsibility for those who believe in Q to be able to explain Q to bring new members on board. Telling people to do their homework by looking up dead links, or tracking through 4chan, to 8chan, to now 8kun (while it lasts) is not going to help the Q movement.
Right now, new people trying to look at Q are not going any substantial background, will not understand any of it, and find a lot of Q supporters are hostile to explaining it. That will make Q die off.
Now, does that sound reasonable to you? I am obviously not a Q supporter. But from what I have posted here, are these matters Q supporters should be concerned, if Q is real, and they want Q to last?
——
Dude! Do you even understand how this sounds?
Geez!
Seriously? #laughy-face.....
You came in with the null hypothesis,
"Q is false unless proven true, and I reserve the right to move the goalposts arbitrarily; and to assign my own presuppositions as axiomatic, but to falsely accuse others' hard-worked-out-and-vetted conclusions as mere airy statements with no substance";
and the belief "I do not have to lift a finger but have everything given to me on a silver platter";
and "I get to claim that since the real life identities of some people who have helped to interpret Q drops, is not sufficiently academically prestigious, or now DC-beltway-insider-enough for my tastes, that perforce the entire thing is a massive case of self-hynosis."
Those who are genuinely neutral but puzzled, frame their objections in a different way.
And if they are brainwashed by the MSM, they bleat loudly what CNN and MSNPC tell them to think; until we begin to teach them to think for themselves.
You engaged in what C.S. Lewis called "Bulverism" -- the practice of refuting an opponent by explaining WHY they are wrong, and dismissing them, before actually demonstrating THAT they are wrong.
That's why they get treated differently.