Trolls always do this.
“Give evidence”.
“That’s not enough.” (Insert fictitious quibble.)
Q did not claim to be giving predictions, but to teach first the autists, then the others, the ability to think and research for themselves.
I’m extending to you the exact same courtesy.
You replied:
1. Please post a link to the drop or its drop number.
2. Accusation and assertion are not proof. Look at how CNN said Trump supporters stormed the white house, when it was clearly ANTIFA.
3. Putting arrows on pictures and say "see?" doesn't prove anything without explanation. Youtube video thumbnails do that all the time. There are no pictures for comparison between the set and the real oval office, so there nothing to compare.
4. There are trees and buildings visible outside the real oval office too in lots of photos too.
Sod off, vermin.
You are not here to discuss in good faith.
(People here to discuss in good faith, would have replied something like, "Gee, I tried Q site XYZ but I can't get its search function to work. Is there a better one?"
or
"Well, I found *this* picture of the White House and grounds, that sure looks like a driveway with cars. Is there an aerial shot of the White House or an outside view to see where the driveway goes?"
For your points 3 and4 in particular, either you're knowingly lying, or the point is going right over your head.
The Castle Rock fake Oval Office, as seen in a number of movies, has a blue carpet with a specific fringe; the REAL White House with President Trump, had a totally different colored carpet. Swapping out a carpet in the Oval Office (due to security measures too many to list) is necessarily going to be slower than in a regular house; further, there is no particular requirement that an incoming President has to change the carpet there on the first day, is there?
AND "there are trees and buildings" --> BFD. Which trees, which buildings, *which driveways*? (not changed easily and a definite security item.
Now as to your point 4.
You're lying through your foul teeth again on numerous points.
1) Q didn't call it fake. Q's last drop was Dec. 8, 2020, long before the inauguration.
2) Those photos of Kim Kardashian are dated Jan 2, 2020. They were taken in the real Trump White House.
3) Hewing to your OWN "rules" assertions are not proof. You didn't show where Q called anything fake; nor did you post the picture you said was called fake, and shown it was the same as the Kardashians.
In fact, the fake photos with a carpet with match the Kardashian photos, are an known and openly admitted sound stage, and NOT the one from Castle Rock.
This goes to show how comparatively easy it is to build a lookalike set.
Which makes the Biden photos all the more damning since they didn't match the real White House Carpet, but DID match the Castle Rock carpet.
For your "look at these views as well" -- full grown trees are hard to move; and their branches are hard to fake. Have you tried, you know, since you are jacking off all over the thread, looking in detail at the trees and roads outside the windows behind the Resolute Desk in each photo?
SO now, following your post 4, you're attempting to confuse the issue, by showing many other photos of unknown provenance which purport to be the Oval Office, thereby attempting to dilute and confuse the real issue.
Known troll technique.
Hint: the real trees around the real White House won't be changing species or number and placement of branches.
Hint 2: A photo of an empty room, without principals in it, is MUCH easier to put into any old article and "call" the Oval Office, thereby giving rise to the tacit lie "the Oval Office changes all the time, discrepancies prove nothing".
My god you are a dishonest and incompetent troll.
Talking back to this kind of troll is what it wants.
They are only here to demoralize.