[bagster]

Putting arrows on pictures and say "see?" doesn't prove anything without explanation.

But Widgey Midgey, some people have brains.

The outside view is the same as what Q is calling fake.

I have a challenge for you, brainiac. Show me where Q called anything fake. Then show me where "Q asserted...Q has asserted..." what you claim he asserted."

You just don't get how this whole Q thing works and you're looking dumber and dumber with every post.

Goot Laws Amighty.

These people are trying to spoon feed you and still ain't taking. You got to get the basics down first, lad.

[greeneyes]

Goot Laws Amighty.

These people are trying to spoon feed you and still ain’t taking. You got to get the basics down first, lad.
*************************************************************************
I told you - not trainable.

[Widget Jr]

I have a challenge for you, brainiac. Show me where Q called anything fake. Then show me where "Q asserted...Q has asserted..." what you claim he asserted."

I was responding to post #3784 by grey_whiskers, who while we disagree, does not take my words out of context like you just did. From #3784:

" So tell me how Q knew in advance the shots of Biden which at least purport to be from the Oval Office, would match those of the movie set of the Oval Office built under the auspices of Castle Rock?"

That is what I was responding to. So based on that post, is it or is it not reasonable to think Q was making the claim Biden was filming from a movie set or not? Are you going to criticize grey_whiskers as well, or just me?