Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
Indian Reservations aren’t really sovereign. In fact, they have less independence than your typical suburban home.

The titles to Indian reservation lands are held by the U.S. government, and the tribes are little more than wards of the government.

92 posted on 01/19/2021 5:41:33 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

That is how it’s implemented NOW, but when the concept was SOLD, they were sovereign nations and that is what the treaties say.


113 posted on 01/19/2021 6:05:33 PM PST by Kevmo (I'm in a slow motion Red Dawn reality TV show. The tree of liberty is thirsty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Right now there are millions of Americans like myself who are looking for cheap places to retire and not get harassed by the guvmint. These reservations would represent a perfect intersection of cooperative wills. But the Indian Nations have the right to exclude you and me from living there on the basis of how many drops of blood in your veins is injun blood. Sovereign nations. Otherwise, such a thing would be considered extremely racist.


116 posted on 01/19/2021 6:08:47 PM PST by Kevmo (I'm in a slow motion Red Dawn reality TV show. The tree of liberty is thirsty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson