Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rfreedom4u

In fact, the ratification documents of Virginia, New York and Rhode Island explicitly said they held the right to resume powers delegated should the federal government become abusive of those powers. The Constitution never would have been ratified if states thought they could not regain their sovereignty — in a word, secede.

Walter Williams


278 posted on 01/22/2021 9:21:53 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: windsorknot
"...explicitly said they held the right to resume powers delegated should the federal government become abusive of those powers. "

Right, that was the Founder's definition of the kinds of "necessity" which compelled them in 1776 to issue their Declaration of Independence.
They also believed that mutual consent was all the authority needed in 1788 to abolish the old Articles of Confederation in favor of their new Constitution.

But no Founder or later President ever proposed or supported unilateral, unapproved declarations of secession at pleasure.
They considered those to be rebellion, insurrection, domestic violence, invasion and/or treason.
And those they opposed with all the military force necessary, be it 1806 (Burr), 1814 (Hartford), 1830 (S.Carolina) or 1860-1 (Confederates).

279 posted on 01/22/2021 11:25:15 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson