Mike Flynn: How About Some “Limited” Martial Law And A Military-Run Election Do-Over?

hotair.com ^ | December 2, 2020 | ALLAHPUNDIT

[Guenevere]

Thank you Ransomnote for the encouragement!
God bless you!

[Dr. Franklin]

What better way for Biden to start his term in office, than follow the General’s excellent suggestion to the letter in his first 30 days but with one minor change: socially distant voting must include an alternative to postal voting because it’s too short notice.

Oh! That was a question, but lacked the proper punctuation... The better way for Biden to start Trump's second term is in Gitmo. They could even put him in a basement cell so he could feel right at home. At Gitmo he and the other conspirators won't be able to cause any of the trouble you worry about. In any event, dusting off the Reconstruction model of using the military to run elections requires an acknowledgment that something is very wrong with how we run our elections. The Dems and the propagandist media are denying that to brainwash the weak minded that everything is normal. Understanding that things are very wrong leads people to also know that the media has been lying to us, and to not trust anything they report.

[MalPearce]

Well, they’re claiming everything has been proved normal by virtue of 50-odd assorted challenges failing to succeed.

I also think a lot of democrats initially reckoned we’re all deluded sore losers clutching at improbable straws... Until some evidence started to cast doubts.

Biden and his enablers genuinely do not think that there was enough fraud to tip the balance in Trump’s favor... But weren’t confident enough to order a full recount.

Another uncalled-for election though... different proposition.

Dangerous option if executed by someone losing authority (Theresa May in the UK will testify to that) but Boris Johnson did it to cement his mandate.

[Pollard]

I think he’s Q

or maybe he thinks he’s Q

I bet he writes a book soon

[Dr. Franklin]

Well, they're claiming everything has been proved normal by virtue of 50-odd assorted challenges failing to succeed.

Only because the media keeps repeating the propaganda that the fraud can't be proved. Once POTUS reclaims the public's broadcast frequencies and presents the DNI's report, that all changes. The facts about foreign interference in the election were never litigated, and the litigation that was filed was dismissed on technicalities like standing, no case or controversy, laches and mootness, which are not decisions on the merits.

There are also something like 5-6 undecided cases on SCOTUS's docket. That means the court process hasn't played out for cases that were lost 4-3 in WI's Supreme Court, and the PA cases in which the PA Supreme Court either exercised extraordinary jurisdiction to keep the PA Commonwealth Court from hearing the case, or reversed that lower court. To anyone who has been watching, the courts are either ducking the issues, or deciding cases in a partisan manner. That doesn't install confidence in those decisions.

I also think a lot of democrats initially reckoned we're all deluded sore losers clutching at improbable straws... Until some evidence started to cast doubts.

That's what they want to believe. The people to be persuaded are those who voted for Trump but because of the all of the propaganda, think that Biden won, the military, and special militia like the police. When these people realize that they were cheated, what the Dems think is irrelevant.

Biden and his enablers genuinely do not think that there was enough fraud to tip the balance in Trump's favor... But weren't confident enough to order a full recount.

They miscalculated, and they got busted. It's their problem, not ours.

Another uncalled-for election though... different proposition. Dangerous option if executed by someone losing authority (Theresa May in the UK will testify to that) but Boris Johnson did it to cement his mandate.

Since Trump won the election, he has the authority to act. The election was a sham and a fraud, and the world knows it.