I've found AT to not be worth the time of day, battling GP as the worst in "conservative" new media. That doesn't mean I thought they were worth shutting down...just sloppy.
The real question is, why is AT (which isn't nearly as widely-reposted as GP) being targeted first? Are they the soft-target before GP, like Parler was before Gab?
It could be. But GAB owns its platform whereas Parlor was hosted on one of Big Tech’s platforms. It seems to me that anyone who has a blog or website hosted on one of Big Tech’s platforms could very well be deplatformed.