There is increasing evidence that the police allowed the demonstrators to access the building without any violence against them being demonstrated.
There is also evidence that Antifa/BLM terrorists infiltrated the crowd of MAGA demonstrators and that these terrorists may have been involved in the attacks.
The shooting of a MAGA demonstrator who was not being violent fits the idea that the demonstrators were being set up to take the fall for any violence.
Exactly.
I know my idea is not going to be glommed onto by enough citizens, but one day all those who called this idea stupid or moronic, will wonder why they stood around and let it happen.
They did that after Nazi Germany was finally defeated. Millions of Germans said they should have done something when they still had the chance.
Well, that chance for us is going to slip away very fast.
Had the entire crowd at the President’s January 6th rally entered the Congress building, instead of a few hundred, the cops would have done nothing. And the protestors would have soon gone home to their families.
If even 10,000 armed Patriots showed up in Washington they could take over every government building. An initial occupation of Washington is not the problem. Without the support of some military faction, the occupiers would soon be isolated and starved out. Think the 1916 Easter uprising in Ireland, the Hungarian revolution of 1956, the Ukrainian uprising of 1968, the petering out of the Hong Kong and Venezuelan protests. As the events of 1775 showed, a revolution requires the willingness of Patriots to tolerate bloodshed: their enemies’ blood and their own. An temporary occupation will do nothing.