Posted on 01/04/2021 3:03:47 AM PST by RandFan
RULING:
*** EXTRADITION DENIED ***
AS IT HAPPENED...
*** COURT IN SESSION ***
@jamesdoleman
Judge now giving her decision...
She is going through the defence arguments and her conclusion, 1. Says the case is governed by the extradition act 2003 (the defence pointed to the political exception in the treaty) but she rejects this.
Judge says that the alledged offences go beyond "encouraging a journalist," and involved a conspiracy to crack secure passwords.
Judge: Next I’m to consider whether the offenses in the request would be offenses in the UK as well as in the US. Mr Assange’s conduct went beyond that of a journalist, in agreeing to help Ms Manning crack a password
Judge now going through the allegations against #Assange in relation to former US soldier Chelsea Manning.
Judge: For months Assange had been communicating with Manning. When told she had nothing left to give him, he said ‘curious eyes never run dry.’ After this comment she downloaded 100s of 1000s of State Dept cables
@kgosztola
Judge is repeating general allegations added in the superseding indictment issued in summer of 2020 and sprung on defense attorneys weeks before extradition trial.
Judge says that #Assange called for people to join the CIA so they could access confidential information, says this was "beyond investigative journalism."
@JohnWRees
Judge is just repeating the US case, including its most dubious claims, in #Assange case.
Judge says the right to free speech does not give anyone "unfettered discretion," to disclose any document they wish.
Judge: defense submits that by disclosing Manning’s documents, Assange was acting as a journalist & should be protected by free speech laws. The difficulty with this argument is it vests in Assange the right to sacrifice the safety of individuals named, in the name of free speech
Judge says that the Wikileaks disclosures led to up to 50 people who had assisted the US government to seek asylum in the United States.
Judge is recounting US govt claims of needing relocate named sources from the cables
Judge refers to Mr Assange’s ‘indiscriminate’ release of State Dept cables, contrasts with redacted cables published by other media outlets
Judge appears to have found Assange in violation of the UK Official Secrets Act.
If proven allegations "would therefore amount to offenses in this jurisdiction that would not be protected by his freedom of speech"
Judge says she is satisfied that the prosecution of Assange was not a political decision by the Trump administration, says Trump "repeatedly and publically praised him."
Judge says she will not look at allegations of US interference at the US embassy at the Ecuadorian embassy as this case is still ongoing in Spain.
Judge says US intelligence might have had legitimate reasons to monitor #Assange in the embassy as they may have legitimately considred him a threat to National security.
Judge rejects defence argument about the delay in prosecution saying there was a "great deal of data," for the authorities to look at and there was no evidence the defence was hampered.
@JohnWRees
This is an outrageously biased and unbalanced judgement.
Judge says any hurt caused to Assange's family by his extradition "is nothing unusual in these kind of proceedings."
Judge says she does not accept it would be impossible to find 12 impartial jurors in the Virginia justice system, or that the plea bargening system was unjust.
Judge says she finds no evidence the US prosecutors "have every intention of punishing Mr Assange"
Judge: no evidence that #Assange would not get a fair trial in the United States.
A US court will ensure that #Assange will get the legal protections in the constitution judge says.
Judge: US courts have held that those outside the US do not possess rights in the US. Mr Assange, when he faces trial, will be on US soil. No authority supports the assertion someone in his position would not have US protections. Reject defense arguments on Article 7
Judge "This court trusts that a US court wil properly consider Mr Assange's right to free speech."
Judge accepts Mr Assange suffers from Autism, and clinical depression, and is at risk of self-harm.
(judge going through some private medical information I'm not going to share)
Judge says that US prison conditions have been taken into account, as well as te risk of #Assange being put under "special administrative measures."
Judge reviewing evidence on Assange's suicidal ideation, time in HMP Belmarsh. 'The overall impression is of a depressed and at times despairing person'
Judge seems to accept Assange could well be sent to ADX Florence, that he would be held in serious isolation
Judge says Assange has the intellect and determination to get round suicide prevention measures.
DRAMA...
JUDGE: Extradition would be oppressive by reason of Assange’s mental health
The United States government's mass incarceration system just lost them their case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
*** EXTRADITION DENIED ***
Assange to remain in custody while the US government decide whether to appeal or not.
Defence ask for time to take instructions.
Good. He needs a pardon, not another prosecution in the US.
And whatever he did, he’s already effectively served a sentence while being confined to the Ecuadorian embassy.
Boot lickers in 1 2 3...
Good!
That freak,Manning,is the one that should be retried.
Agreed Manning was the criminal. Assange was reporting
Wonder if the decision has anything to do with Spygate...?
The judge citing health reasons like autism and mental health.
She actually said that the US would be unable to prevent Assange from committing suicide in prison.
Did she consult Jeffrey Epstein on that one?...sarc
Yes outo.
I was following it live on twitter and it did not seem like it was going well.... looked a formality.
Then she came out with that dramatic twist and denied on health grounds.
I’m happy for Julian though for now he remains in custody.
But that reasoning is pretty lame. Can’t get extradited because of his mental health? Every person in jail will want out now. Due to their mental health.
Fortunately, Trump can pardon him and bring him here.
The judge would have had psychiatric reports etc. from medical professionals citing suicide risk, autism and depression.
I guess this weighed heavy in her decision
Did someone make a case against extradition? Because whoever did would have obtained those reports.
Thing is, what if the plan was to get him here FIRST and then pardon him after getting a bit of information? I don’t feel like he’s safer in the UK, their laws against journalists are positively draconian. Look how they treated Tommy Robinson.
Assange isn’t safer. Which is why the UK is still holding him.
Wonder what Assange knows about Spygate...
Yes of course. She seemed to accept most of the Crowns case (representing the US govt) and that he would get a fair trial in Virginia..
But dramatically then accepted the defense case regarding his health.
In the original hearing a few months back I believe they had doctors testify that he was at risk especially if sent to a Superomax prison and kept in isolation.
Judge: “Faced with the conditions of near total isolation without the protective factors which limited his risk at HMP Belmarsh, I am satisfied the procedures described by the US will not prevent Mr Assange from finding a way to commit suicide and for this reason I have decided extradition would be oppressive by reason of mental harm and I order his discharge.”
Bail application to be made on Wednesday. Hope he makes it.
Executed.
He was a traitor and did his document dump because he’s a radical homofascist who was upset over Clinton’s don’t ask don’t tell policy.
He was no whistleblower. He pilfered documents because that was his agenda.
No, there is no legal system any more. Manning should just be shot dead
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.