Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bayard
I thought she was real.

She was frustrated with the comments about "what are YOU going to do about it?"

She said that if the PRESIDENT of the United States can't get any traction, can't get any court to look at the evidence, can't get the Republicans on his side to back him up, then what is SHE expected to do about it?

It's a legitimate sentiment, to feel so powerless when the supposed "most powerful office in the world" can't get the proper authorities to do their jobs fairly.

-PJ

98 posted on 12/23/2020 1:00:08 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

Debbie Downer was just saying what the risk we are running if we don’t fight/win this one.

She was asking who polices these elections in the end if everyone wants to pass the buck?


100 posted on 12/23/2020 1:01:33 PM PST by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

We’ll in 2013 in the beginning of Obama’s 2nd term of Office, before we had any idea that Trump would be President, what did we hope for then?

Here’s a couple of thoughts I’ve been mulling over.

Dominion voting machines have to be managed by local elected officials still. There are Hundreds of thousands of local elections. How can that all be perfectly rigged forever?

So local elections matter, the more cheating is done by them the less likely they become useful as people will eventually “wise up” to the cases of fraud or use them themselves, until everyone is sick of those machines.

This country will, if Trump is really out after Jan 20th, continue its downward spiral but then “Orange man bad” is to blame just wont carry that much water.

We may be into national bankruptcy but there are over 400 million firearms held by Americans. The idea that any disarming is remotely possible in as a short term pipe dream. Attempts to quickly do so will lead to actual civil war.

The Establishment has to ride that tiger of “legal election” long and hard. That is really not as easy as it sounds. Especially as people get more and more restless with lockdowns and in spite of the fact that the Media has fallen on its sword and is getting more and more fragmented into the internet and alternate media.

Just some considerations I’ve been reviewing. I’ve come to the point that if Trump actually has a master “4d Chess” move, I can do nothing with how and when he plays it. If he doesn’t have that move, I cannot make one for him but must be secure in my own principles and continue the fight as if it was 2013.

Some additional considerations, if the Supreme court is packed, then war is inevitable. If Democrats in 2022 gain/retain the Senate, then war is inevitable.


114 posted on 12/23/2020 1:15:57 PM PST by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

I thought she was legit. I felt her frustration when she talked about the courts NOT EVEN LISTENING.


165 posted on 12/23/2020 2:38:13 PM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson