Posted on 12/23/2020 6:50:09 AM PST by Candor7
For greater certainty:
https://davejanda.com/patrick-byrne-what-really-happened-during-the-white-house-meeting/
The entire meeting had to do with the suits brought against trump and others including Newsmax. It had nothing to do with pressing the election issues, but rather defending against the counter-suits.
Defending against counter suits? They should be welcoming them...
I can’t download a video right now. I hope someone just posts the gist of it.
You don’t have to download. Play it.
Patrick Byrne had to step down from his own company.
Are we going to take advice from John McAfee next?
Thatsa not what the video reveals. Interesting take though.
Play the video and listen. Its not about defending lawsuits. Its about staffing and strategy for the fight in Congress.
It almost came to blows.
Cipilone and two other WH staff lawyers were preventing the exposure of the evidence of fraud.They got called on it big time.
Its not advice. Its what happened.
According to one man. A man forced to leave his own company.
I’m not sure if you’ve noticed it, but some odd people of questionable behavior are attracted to Trump.
The imagination of some people based on no evidence is incredible.
And don't you dare call them out on their fantasy - because if you do you're a traitor, a troll, a Debby Downer, and the the very cause of this problem.
“I’m not sure if you’ve noticed it, but some odd people of questionable behavior are attracted to Trump.”
Do you believe Trump is bad for country because of this?
“I’m not sure if you’ve noticed it, but some odd people of questionable behavior are attracted to Trump.”
Do you believe Trump is bad for country because of this?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
could be more DS plants on the inside.
the swamp is deep & wide. hard to find anybody in DC that is not compromised.
the past 4 years has been an intelligence op against trump, IMO
No, and that’s not even remotely near what I was implying.
I think listening to far fetched stories, that have no corroborating evidence, is foolish.
Nonsense about shootouts in Germany...foolish.
Kraken...foolish.
And the post right after yours says I might be some DS plant...foolish.
If I was some DS person, do you think I would give two shits about you or some unverifiable story?
These stories make our side, and this site, look foolish.
What Trump should take out of this 4 hour meeting is compare what the New York Times has reported on this meeting. Is the New York Times report accurate? Patrick Bryne said the New York Times is reporting on a lie. If Trump agrees with Bryne, then he must determine who leaked this story to the New York Times.
Better to appear a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
You're precisely why we don't need people like you complaining when we're trying to win this thing. You're more concerned about appearances than results.
If you would take the time to watch and listen to the video, this is exactly what it talks about....all of the White House staff and lawyers surrounding Trump giving him bad advice about why he can't take this course of action or that course of action because it would make him look bad in the media.
When you are trying to win, it is not helpful to have naysayers surrounding you. You need positive, can-do people around you telling you that you CAN do this and win. The "You-can't-do-this" advice never won anything.
So please hold your negative comments in abeyance until the end results are in and then you can either look like the fool or tell the rest of us, I told you so. But in the meantime, you are not being helpful to the effort for Trump to regain the office that was stolen from him.
I was asking because there are bunch of people here who believe Trump supports it.
I have no interest in writing “I told you so” later on.
If you think my posts shouldn’t be allowed, hit report abuse. Otherwise I will post when and what I think is true.
Posting stories like these, and commenting on then, will do absolutely nothing to make Trump POTUS on January 21st.(Unless you’re on his legal team)
You confuse negative with pragmatic, and positive with delusional.
I think when you try to find exceptional people(multiple standards of deviation from the norm) some will be outstanding, and others will be “dumpster fires”.
It’s hard to tell initially which way someone will go.
As POTUS, one has very little time to make a decision on someone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.